Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261463AbTIYTkI (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Sep 2003 15:40:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261700AbTIYTkH (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Sep 2003 15:40:07 -0400 Received: from ppp-217-133-42-200.cust-adsl.tiscali.it ([217.133.42.200]:12230 "EHLO velociraptor.random") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261463AbTIYTkB (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Sep 2003 15:40:01 -0400 Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 21:41:00 +0200 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel Cc: Kernel Mailing List Subject: OT go to gnu-arch-users for these matters (Re: log-buf-len dynamic) Message-ID: <20030925194100.GN9953@velociraptor.random> References: <20030925182233.GA1356@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <20030925183623.GC18749@work.bitmover.com> <20030925190222.GA4769@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20030925190222.GA4769@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-GPG-Key: 1024D/68B9CB43 13D9 8355 295F 4823 7C49 C012 DFA1 686E 68B9 CB43 X-PGP-Key: 1024R/CB4660B9 CC A0 71 81 F4 A0 63 AC C0 4B 81 1D 8C 15 C8 E5 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2051 Lines: 42 On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 09:02:22PM +0200, J?rn Engel wrote: > Actually, you already do that, just with some html around it. That > could be stripped off on your side to save bandwidth or I could do it > myself with a little perl. I already did that in python, no need to reinvet the wheel :) It works fine for any project hosted on bkbits but only as far as you've a reference point to start with (i.e. you've an old tarball) and as far as there are no merge from cloned trees in the main branch. http://www.us.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/openbkweb/openbkweb-0.0.tar.gz I'll let it die quickly first because it was using too much bandwidth according to Larry, and secondly because it couldn't handle merges across different trees. that's why Larry provided us with the bkcvs then. But it should still work in theory, though I doubt it can be very useful if they do merges. BTW, for obvious reasons I'm posting emails on these matter _only_ on gnu-arch-users, I already suggested a number of features I need and that I'd like to add to arch to be usable for my 2.4-aa (for an usage like b*tkeeper it seems just usable right now but I need more dedicated features to be able to maintain my tree with a revision control system, like being able to hook [tag in arch terms] to a unpacked tree with hardlinks and be able to rollback rejecting patchsets and overwriting them in new revisions, and automatic conversion from patchsets to an ordered serie of patches with a meaningful name). All the details here: http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users thanks, Andrea - If you prefer relying on open source software, check these links: rsync.kernel.org::pub/scm/linux/kernel/bkcvs/linux-2.[45]/ http://www.cobite.com/cvsps/ svn://svn.kernel.org/linux-2.[46]/trunk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/