Message-ID: <785F348679A4D5119A0C009027DE33C105CDB177@mcoexc04.mlm.maxtor.com>
From: "Mudama, Eric" <eric_mudama@Maxtor.com>
To: "'ebiederm@xmission.com'" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
       Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: andrea@kernel.org, Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>,
       Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com.br>,
       Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>
Subject: RE: log-buf-len dynamic
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 13:43:29 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1103
Lines: 26

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ebiederm@xmission.com [mailto:ebiederm@xmission.com]
> Subject: Re: log-buf-len dynamic
>
> I expressed it badly.  But the kernel using BK both introduces people
> to BK, and it validates BK as a useful tool.  Especially as the kernel
> tends to embody many of the best practices in the community.

Personally I fail to see the problem with this.  BK must be (I assume) a
useful tool to someone, or it wouldn't exist.

> I am pretty certain I could write up something that got the core of
> the repository right in a month or two.

I've only been following LKML for about 4 months, and this must be the 5th
or
6th time I've seen someone post an email with this jist to it.  If it only
took a month or two, I am sure someone would have posted an announcement
about their new tool in the time I've been on the list.

--eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/