Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp1735920imm; Sat, 4 Aug 2018 09:37:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpeFjSdQtvLfDLr29Y3yqHmoy5RjiSoXPXMGbUvAThyLEuE+njVK/MYkzTN6fl/FmzCB/v/u X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:20e9:: with SMTP id v38-v6mr7914804plg.107.1533400627116; Sat, 04 Aug 2018 09:37:07 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1533400627; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=CiFlI+9SAeDh5cf36Nwq9Rquvd2zl8gSNxOTjjO4kRXfSDDMWiYeJy65foY8yKsjWl j237sTcyKNLS6+FzQ4T+psBnUZd8e/TN5mgsPggHCA6NEBJZLtPd73N8i+zzwKtOdOAq 6HP5xWHNVXNwmEJMVj5Xz0V4/sf5jwSePP/WOTo6d2YiTPf8YbsXvUOVc+5rgRORcxdi a5ZHIlCUUR897hyIDksM40SfGLicbY3+7i2bJU60crXlGdNhvjz9bDSXGMqB24Wp6+6O aSNIf1hKPAbwMThKk7C4HAs0lkqzv9GkfYEZRIQ3xul9urkxVcC03/RCkM6zTKPYzdYI lfog== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=rrcrWCONSEF8BePdDEoLdPoKy9CsKHoghTDtdhzrfRo=; b=0Y3x6kQjuH00vQh16gAUCOPCRS6jIN5J/6H6zK6+d16Gl0ov2e5G5YGe3zwm6tdTtj hMRXmemUaqSxFhsa6VfdEBNDWoWqvQStitCLLgJ/lsjVuDbNObzmFzEH5Twm6dBzA9jJ MlJhYGnoGyEvyu2NejO/1ADOpkYNo30PxMzDVYD7VzYs3xvhXDbPPBPXQAw3pHTYOeVP Tj4lCyrV5BAnaF6Es3Gxii1/GTnvpeBLHdut1tXoyN4puwSxSeUHzN+iM5HQGEUSvr9A 4073WTLEdSM8OfxzU/qC0BJ4SmR+Ijr40pGMZaKMLypxQL8kn1JYAVEWn4fVoC4CbM0L Oubg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m76-v6si8222650pfg.323.2018.08.04.09.36.52; Sat, 04 Aug 2018 09:37:07 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729600AbeHDShT (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 4 Aug 2018 14:37:19 -0400 Received: from mail.cn.fujitsu.com ([183.91.158.132]:7784 "EHLO heian.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728417AbeHDShT (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Aug 2018 14:37:19 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.43,368,1503331200"; d="scan'208";a="43070901" Received: from unknown (HELO cn.fujitsu.com) ([10.167.33.5]) by heian.cn.fujitsu.com with ESMTP; 05 Aug 2018 00:35:56 +0800 Received: from G08CNEXCHPEKD02.g08.fujitsu.local (unknown [10.167.33.83]) by cn.fujitsu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 723234B6ADEE; Sun, 5 Aug 2018 00:35:51 +0800 (CST) Received: from fnst.localdomain (10.167.226.155) by G08CNEXCHPEKD02.g08.fujitsu.local (10.167.33.89) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.399.0; Sun, 5 Aug 2018 00:35:54 +0800 Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2018 00:35:48 +0800 From: Lu Fengqi To: zhong jiang CC: , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs/extent_map: Remove unneeded variable "ret" Message-ID: <20180804163548.GG2049@fnst.localdomain> References: <1533381223-16734-1-git-send-email-zhongjiang@huawei.com> <20180804125947.GF2049@fnst.localdomain> <5B65A7E9.90607@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5B65A7E9.90607@huawei.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Originating-IP: [10.167.226.155] X-yoursite-MailScanner-ID: 723234B6ADEE.AC1DF X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-yoursite-MailScanner-From: lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com X-Spam-Status: No Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 09:19:37PM +0800, zhong jiang wrote: >On 2018/8/4 20:59, Lu Fengqi wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 07:13:43PM +0800, zhong jiang wrote: >>> The ret is not used after initalization, So just remove it. >> So why not change these two functions to void function? >> > I just keep the original interface and make the minimal change. >of course, It is also feasible that make these two functions to void function. > >I will repost if you prefer to that change. I am ok with that. Since the return value which always is 0 is meaningless, I would prefer to make this change. -- Thanks, Lu > >Thanks, >zhong jiang > > >