Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Sat, 4 Aug 2018 22:33:36 +0100
From:   Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org>
To:     Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc:     Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2, simpler] ia64: fix ptrace(PTRACE_GETREGS) (unbreaks
 strace, gdb)
Message-ID: <20180804223336.5f29778e@sf>
In-Reply-To: <20180309231555.16925-1-slyfox@gentoo.org>
References: <20180211185134.76ccfd45@sf>
        <20180309231555.16925-1-slyfox@gentoo.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri,  9 Mar 2018 23:15:55 +0000
Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org> wrote:

I tried to explain in more detail breakage mechanics
of unwinder and gcc code generation quirks at:
    https://trofi.github.io/posts/210-ptrace-and-accidental-boot-fix-on-ia64.html
Hopefully it gives better intuition of code change
caused by both proposed patches.

I personally think v1 patch is slightly more robust.

-- 

  Sergei