Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 16:12:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 16:12:14 -0500 Received: from tungsten.btinternet.com ([194.73.73.81]:55695 "EHLO tungsten.btinternet.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 16:12:05 -0500 From: davej@suse.de Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 21:11:59 +0000 (GMT) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: celeron-class misdetected as 486 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Pavel Machek wrote.. > pavel@bug:~$ cat /proc/cpuinfo > processor : 0 > vendor_id : GenuineIntel > cpu family : 4 ^^^ Since when were there family 4 Celerons ? > model : 0 > model name : 486 DX-25/33 > stepping : 0 > cache size : 128 KB Though a 486 with 128K cache is also unlikely. (Although some of the wierd overdrives had such added fun iirc) >.... that's wrong. Older kernels detect it correctly as: >May 10 21:39:04 bug kernel: Pentium-III serial number disabled. >May 10 21:39:04 bug kernel: CPU: Intel Celeron (Mendocino) stepping 0a Which older kernel detected this ? This is really bizarre, as there are cpuid capable 486s with the family/vendor IDs reported above. I do hope we don't have to add more cachesize checking. That part of setup.c is ugly enough already. Can you open up and find out if it really is a Celeron in that box before such code gets added ? regards, Dave. -- | Dave Jones http://www.suse.de/~davej | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/