Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp4370555imm; Mon, 6 Aug 2018 23:52:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpfL6c/pyEQGlfEjgrWEj5Py3OOIuUW642wyaD/B/T/JHY6vVKMkva0YmPgPqk22x1btdZZb X-Received: by 2002:a62:f610:: with SMTP id x16-v6mr20492416pfh.169.1533624736738; Mon, 06 Aug 2018 23:52:16 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1533624736; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=SRZQaZ49W4vrM/M89TWEgufur756U//t+EqwGwTg8uNE6hxHErBnnHOeEnkhihudV4 0GYJG1i2dH7W0Gjw1yfEhs2g69g1Mg0BOnam0ZQhICRMkp5yZDZjMIxisTUV2VH/JuXa 8AN3NVtuz+6WV8QMeJCJt+S3mlByulvVSU27Hp5O8OZytFwozffrLVCNv+NHgWzzppvt 3A0hxkCRRh8liCZYIiL5bbGIiglWNfBDsjTLzuHj9nf97xJDuzdvHKlysealAlP7F6XS WZTmfKLwxR77yxq1KKzmsU8BnawfZTYxIgvPLQ0EQllGDR8LvbCoGgrWzEo0WkTOznjx YEwQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=Pl0R3Bhr1hCFwQlwwmhE5R7dH4H3EmaDfdV9oHRCrLQ=; b=dHCMxquISv9svq9MsOKxp+Djx6WYFOjqQmjIm72xDCSTOILvr9mBTho6C8RLl4GOuG KZKYdB4v2OXx2aO8JCay6cS7/LAGlPyiUDZ37+d/J39NRHuZSnIZ/i+xot7167+M13L4 WL66yq1BSfDMSUcZ8TT/rsQOSNFP6qF1gICafazjguQqq51xyCYSqJTqL/Ow5tKN8utS mTxf/AENeutkJwSvuzmiKGDW8PzJ2Ywl/Csu8jiWglRcgSIVdvhH6WNXctZ61H+azPU3 jq8mREYww0fEdtjm5OMxxvtmmgk4nGILAAWvWXlUJiJ9B5k/h2u4eAHQ4pWCKvupgl/m RIXw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w14-v6si706707pgh.14.2018.08.06.23.52.02; Mon, 06 Aug 2018 23:52:16 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388656AbeHGIua (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 7 Aug 2018 04:50:30 -0400 Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.32]:33174 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388204AbeHGIua (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Aug 2018 04:50:30 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS411-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id F101722A0A5AD; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 14:37:37 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.142.68.147) by DGGEMS411-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.211) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.399.0; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 14:37:37 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: clean the additional checks before calling ghes_notify_sea() To: Will Deacon , gengdongjiu CC: Catalin Marinas , , "Len Brown" , , , , arm-mail-list , Linux Kernel Mailing List , , References: <1532638907-46129-1-git-send-email-gengdongjiu@huawei.com> <20180727100617.GB25592@arm.com> <20180806142623.GA15275@arm.com> From: gengdongjiu Message-ID: <2c3baa9e-c647-01a9-cef6-eb61ba6c529c@huawei.com> Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 14:37:36 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180806142623.GA15275@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.142.68.147] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2018/8/6 22:26, Will Deacon wrote: >> Will, >> This patch will be applied, right? thanks > I haven't queued it in the arm64 tree, since it touches include/acpi/ghes.h > and you don't have an ack from the acpi folks. I acked it so that you could > route it via the acpi tree without me holding you up. Thanks the explanation. yes, this patch touches the "include/acpi/ghes.h", I will repost this patch to let acpi folks review it. > > Will > >>>> This cleanup is ever mentioned by Mark Rutland in [1]