Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 07 Aug 2018 11:24:13 -0400
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <20180807110906.3a1b0ac4@gandalf.local.home>
References: <20180730222423.196630-1-joel@joelfernandes.org> <20180730222423.196630-4-joel@joelfernandes.org> <20180806155058.5ee875f4@gandalf.local.home> <CAJWu+oqvpev_EZC38_mi+UNRCxS8GqNVagHyGM4dUjruzKgwgQ@mail.gmail.com> <20180806214300.13e63523@gandalf.local.home> <CAJWu+oqZi2W9OYAn2xu17fdrBitQs4Gti4LxWmtx5B-EYtNMmA@mail.gmail.com> <20180807094954.5137972d@gandalf.local.home> <446AE5F2-39E0-46B6-8E0B-207E003DBF20@google.com> <20180807103410.4fe203cb@gandalf.local.home> <C1CB990F-8232-4168-89A8-E8C13B660B0B@google.com> <20180807110906.3a1b0ac4@gandalf.local.home>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 3/3] tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usage
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
CC:     Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Cc: Android Kernel" <kernel-team@android.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
        Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Thomas Glexiner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com>
From:   Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Message-ID: <6B9E5DC9-0859-41B4-9B72-A7D85E9EA2AD@google.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


On August 7, 2018 11:09:06 AM EDT, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis=2Eorg> =
wrote:
>On Tue, 07 Aug 2018 10:48:05 -0400
>Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google=2Ecom> wrote:
>
>> >You mean if someone add a tracepoint callback to the irq disable
>> >tracepoint, and did a lockdep assert to make sure interrupts are
>> >disabled? =20
>>=20
>> Yes that's what I meant=2E
>
>That sounds like a "Doctor, it hurts me when I do this" problem ;-)

Haha, yes true=2E But just to clarify, I didn't do this to see the problem=
 but noticed it with turning on existing things=2E :-) but I see your point=
=2E=2E=2E

Thanks,

- Joel

--=20
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail=2E Please excuse my brevity=2E