Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 7 Aug 2018 11:09:06 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To:     Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Cc:     Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Cc: Android Kernel" <kernel-team@android.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
        Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Thomas Glexiner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 3/3] tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and
 unify their usage
Message-ID: <20180807110906.3a1b0ac4@gandalf.local.home>
In-Reply-To: <C1CB990F-8232-4168-89A8-E8C13B660B0B@google.com>
References: <20180730222423.196630-1-joel@joelfernandes.org>
        <20180730222423.196630-4-joel@joelfernandes.org>
        <20180806155058.5ee875f4@gandalf.local.home>
        <CAJWu+oqvpev_EZC38_mi+UNRCxS8GqNVagHyGM4dUjruzKgwgQ@mail.gmail.com>
        <20180806214300.13e63523@gandalf.local.home>
        <CAJWu+oqZi2W9OYAn2xu17fdrBitQs4Gti4LxWmtx5B-EYtNMmA@mail.gmail.com>
        <20180807094954.5137972d@gandalf.local.home>
        <446AE5F2-39E0-46B6-8E0B-207E003DBF20@google.com>
        <20180807103410.4fe203cb@gandalf.local.home>
        <C1CB990F-8232-4168-89A8-E8C13B660B0B@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 07 Aug 2018 10:48:05 -0400
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com> wrote:

> >You mean if someone add a tracepoint callback to the irq disable
> >tracepoint, and did a lockdep assert to make sure interrupts are
> >disabled?  
> 
> Yes that's what I meant.

That sounds like a "Doctor, it hurts me when I do this" problem ;-)

-- Steve