Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp4968799imm; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 10:16:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpcMdReO8ZxSw+OccM3o4otCpzSp6k8Dn9n1y4mZBZaxEQBtYv8nGfpU2Qh54BBkfvGCgC+w X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:aa87:: with SMTP id d7-v6mr18692013plr.215.1533662202730; Tue, 07 Aug 2018 10:16:42 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1533662202; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=PZQb4jJYgYk82tDtWKLkmpvjxxMWRCC4aviYyWKgnu5Tzk2BWdQrMr2tsfTRrcO31J PP5ULC/01qWiqcY7tDDY/yTeakXw8cKXNFJ1vB7NRRjkRj0+v2y63mknDDQmvlypo/eR DSlVJvIHRfrAAYSvNS0q9GiY0hkcAFiwVLc+3nktWsIg3W1xVWvSdLyA8EMEF2JguGpO x730B4McPuZ8qMT6eWFziJxrDWJwdMC52WoSGAAmQKHggpvE6PnTnHaTJhvVbayXmwy3 tGjH8I8pbni5edb2K2YbzsH+YLelAUVGcPbFMlP4rcudc8+8WYbteO8pzzV315n8AZ/N t8sQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :from:references:cc:to:subject:reply-to:arc-authentication-results; bh=Cau1YMETRrLadnt6SiAqRfIkMfHmGK7njccdOqoSG+M=; b=K1Qwfo24uKb8Iiv7RUOh/OjZ/WCmmFYhlcqkrzFwGoOBrIL9m3oqe/N7vX+Zfa3UFU /cgOIJOymvrdm3nbnq2vbSkOPSpw/9nSX66hCGyFvbaXSJwEgKYpbO0yxOE07a6q08Tz NSm4BSGN6Ouqv2WLN+uhfImgS30/gmU70EWL8gYBMRgolYMU3QINtWVMHuMxq+8Avpmf hVnB5X3KS9fcKEzEI2QYRzQYZ/DUELZ83Vvzyd2EsIXm+Tv37s/Kl2nLvcGAU5LKLyja yl+RFuE5z+1ugpuFYJLYL90GCdx1plVVSuO0Ks8TS0VsGKAL2QkzPqLC2UrIzd9844a+ DxoA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 75-v6si1884452pgh.110.2018.08.07.10.16.28; Tue, 07 Aug 2018 10:16:42 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390166AbeHGTa3 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 7 Aug 2018 15:30:29 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:49930 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727354AbeHGTa3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Aug 2018 15:30:29 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w77H9l6N070998 for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 13:15:09 -0400 Received: from e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.103]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2kqe30cep1-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 07 Aug 2018 13:15:09 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 18:15:07 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.198) by e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.137) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Tue, 7 Aug 2018 18:15:05 +0100 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w77HF31V24183028 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 7 Aug 2018 17:15:03 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BD5F4C050; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 20:15:12 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 296824C046; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 20:15:12 +0100 (BST) Received: from [9.152.224.92] (unknown [9.152.224.92]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 20:15:12 +0100 (BST) Reply-To: pmorel@linux.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] KVM: s390: vsie: support VCPU requests To: David Hildenbrand , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , Martin Schwidefsky , Cornelia Huck , Janosch Frank , Christian Borntraeger References: <20180807125131.3606-1-david@redhat.com> From: Pierre Morel Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 19:15:02 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180807125131.3606-1-david@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18080717-0028-0000-0000-000002E7821A X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18080717-0029-0000-0000-000023A088A7 Message-Id: <65aefa0e-275f-1a30-2237-904aa4c6d63b@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-08-07_06:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1807170000 definitions=main-1808070172 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/08/2018 14:51, David Hildenbrand wrote: > While discussing AP changes, we discovered that we will have to force > a CPU using the vSIE to regenerate/reload shadow data structures. For now, > we have no mechanism for that. > > E.g. when clearing AP masks later, we could still have a vSIE CPU making > use of AP adapters as the masks might not be considered yet in the vSIE > data structures. We need a way to block entering the vSIE and regenerate > all shadow data structures once done. > > Looks like we can achieve that by simply simulating an ordinary SIE > entry/exit in the VCPU sie control block (while entering the vSIE loop). > > This way, we can support blocking and also synchronous CPU requests. > > Only compile tested. > > David Hildenbrand (2): > KVM: s390: vsie: simulate VCPU SIE entry/exit > KVM: s390: introduce and use KVM_REQ_VSIE_RESTART > > arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 + > arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 16 ++++++++++++++-- > arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h | 1 + > arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++-- > 4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > Thanks David for your patches. Following my tests, they work fine for our AP use case. Best regards, Pierre -- Pierre Morel Linux/KVM/QEMU in Böblingen - Germany