Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 7 Aug 2018 19:48:51 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     kan.liang@linux.intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
        len.brown@intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/cpu: Rename Denverton and Gemini Lake
Message-ID: <20180807174851.GJ2494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <1533662247-17575-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
 <1b7cb461-5321-86cf-3031-5ff545c3dc42@linux.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1b7cb461-5321-86cf-3031-5ff545c3dc42@linux.intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.0 (2018-05-17)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 10:35:42AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 08/07/2018 10:17 AM, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > Denverton and Gemini Lake are platform names and should not be used for
> > Processor Family stuff. The microarchitecture codename should be used.
> 
> Why?
> 
> Denverton is the platform.  "Goldmont" is literally the
> microarchitecture, and you are suggesting moving *to* the
> microarchitecture name, which contradicts the description.

All the other (big core) are uarch names. Atom is weird in that it mixes
uarch with platform names.