Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 8 Aug 2018 11:08:27 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To:     Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Cc:     akpm@linux-foundation.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
        rafael@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
        darrick.wong@oracle.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
        josh@joshtriplett.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
        mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
        hughd@google.com, shuah@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
        ulf.hansson@linaro.org, aspriel@gmail.com,
        vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, joe@perches.com,
        heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com,
        mhocko@suse.com, chris@chris-wilson.co.uk,
        penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp, aryabinin@virtuozzo.com,
        willy@infradead.org, ying.huang@intel.com, shakeelb@google.com,
        jbacik@fb.com, mingo@kernel.org, mhiramat@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 01/10] rcu: Make CONFIG_SRCU unconditionally enabled
Message-ID: <20180808110827.65631461@canb.auug.org.au>
In-Reply-To: <153365625652.19074.8434946780002619802.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
References: <153365347929.19074.12509495712735843805.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
        <153365625652.19074.8434946780002619802.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
 boundary="Sig_//wODAd0V11DVLAu0Qy+Ta_s"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

--Sig_//wODAd0V11DVLAu0Qy+Ta_s
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Kirill,

On Tue, 07 Aug 2018 18:37:36 +0300 Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com> wrot=
e:
>
> This patch kills all CONFIG_SRCU defines and
> the code under !CONFIG_SRCU.
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>

So what sort of overheads (in terms of code size and performance) are
we adding by having SRCU enabled where it used not to be?

--=20
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

--Sig_//wODAd0V11DVLAu0Qy+Ta_s
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAltqQosACgkQAVBC80lX
0GxHGwgAjVnIoT20e4JSYycGiEqHHa55yGjv5LKngiTucYPHmJ31bMFrkK3RVd7s
r6M6RVXSQVA21k/Vy8hPV0q+sHChA38xfCx0ZebSrsGfpzy3x/5lgGBUNLZmEoW1
bsYT5/XV6AUM1bWbmO+llnIC4LSL4dN+RMYngElcto8++M6E5YG+5YGCNs+wcrKu
Xg5jSShO/G2U0nRMENEeXexcMeRfShGpAeejrZScad23wkkx+TJ+O1lw1ln6afdv
c2PRz3pEYmWINiCjZNEwOz1NGsjmHh8IgWnfP3rNID4iq1Gw+3cxO5L+cfX9vCzv
jhofBYIo7A5Yf3dmGUvsKTqx7SsuLA==
=4lXj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_//wODAd0V11DVLAu0Qy+Ta_s--