Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging/bcm2835-audio: Fix alignment of function
 arguments - Style
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
        Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
        linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
References: <20180808014048.18456-1-greg@embeddedgreg.com>
 <20180808122604.GA27932@kroah.com>
From:   Greg Gallagner <greg@embeddedgreg.com>
Message-ID: <872dfe2f-59cf-baf9-490b-8b489c44ba5f@embeddedgreg.com>
Date:   Wed, 8 Aug 2018 08:54:49 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180808122604.GA27932@kroah.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 08/08/2018 08:26 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 09:40:47PM -0400, Greg Gallagher wrote:
>> Fix warnings generated by checkpatch.pl for alignment should match open
>> parenthesis.  This is a coding style change only.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Greg Gallagher <greg@embeddedgreg.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v2:
>>     - Clean up all the alignment warnings in the file
>> ---
>>  .../staging/vc04_services/bcm2835-audio/bcm2835-ctl.c  | 18 +++++++++---------
>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> You sent 2 patches that did the same thing, with different subjects :(
>
> Please fix up and send only the "correct" one.
>
> greg k-h
Sorry, the first one was a mistake and I should have sent something saying
to ignore it.  I will double check the second one is correct.  Is there
a best
practice when I'd like a patch ignored?

thanks

Greg