Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 8 Aug 2018 16:10:47 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Greg Gallagner <greg@embeddedgreg.com>
Cc:     Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
        Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
        linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging/bcm2835-audio: Fix alignment of function
 arguments - Style
Message-ID: <20180808141047.GA7080@kroah.com>
References: <20180808014048.18456-1-greg@embeddedgreg.com>
 <20180808122604.GA27932@kroah.com>
 <872dfe2f-59cf-baf9-490b-8b489c44ba5f@embeddedgreg.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <872dfe2f-59cf-baf9-490b-8b489c44ba5f@embeddedgreg.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 08:54:49AM -0400, Greg Gallagner wrote:
> On 08/08/2018 08:26 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 09:40:47PM -0400, Greg Gallagher wrote:
> >> Fix warnings generated by checkpatch.pl for alignment should match open
> >> parenthesis.  This is a coding style change only.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Greg Gallagher <greg@embeddedgreg.com>
> >> ---
> >> Changes in v2:
> >>     - Clean up all the alignment warnings in the file
> >> ---
> >>  .../staging/vc04_services/bcm2835-audio/bcm2835-ctl.c  | 18 +++++++++---------
> >>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > You sent 2 patches that did the same thing, with different subjects :(
> >
> > Please fix up and send only the "correct" one.
> >
> > greg k-h
> Sorry, the first one was a mistake and I should have sent something saying
> to ignore it.? I will double check the second one is correct.? Is there
> a best
> practice when I'd like a patch ignored?

Just respond to the email and say "please ignore this patch" or
something like that.

thanks,
greg k-h