Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp1025537imm; Wed, 8 Aug 2018 09:29:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPwvzCceIfXRBnGdng0vfV9mIWo+wEIu+3stF3oCgIwmowXJtwvPOxMgwM3D20RCNb6Xi8G7 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:bd44:: with SMTP id b4-v6mr3301266plx.144.1533745767100; Wed, 08 Aug 2018 09:29:27 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1533745767; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=vrlzrrWj0ayxi7A+x7YzV1vuzSdB9mvqn1rAibhSbIyf0BjLggW3z5Rao5pJ9f6CfR w0N1mcvcezCa6+TUmWY2jjY6wpOEHlYaZaEmybEJ7Vt38NuX3CYEryjOg99aFN9vZl49 5X0KgblXMbIUxFZJ7raZUumCwb8CBGf95L7UrQkJxO8pBjD9OqqXEIPKqojapjk7KUZr fnThMmRdo72XK0yClA/lmyfyuTiB5KJn2l5mbRQSC8w339ejKynnXYApPlJ6KcTWckt7 kPk/Tykpt4hl37Q5zLlW97spvOcRbyGRZrUYedCEmW9Sc7rnf9iuqWToW/DtpI3s2iBO fJXQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=YhaKZIqjDESWe1+0KnHRsmtXQnZ2TdYFXQzMb7Qioag=; b=IN1wH5tDrJHYZKqupjqV0LiJ/04nQefwOyaCDGdqh3zdvohiGESbcS+zbGf1YJ89gv X2FtMhu6uq9eliq4hes7rx4SJXCvJl1ihDMPY0/U+B5K0C0kAnmk78kzP3un1rTLBTjB 67vkQymHJpdT5Fb7wwkJWnIqGdL3oO3dQbaJuePPhUQyu7rcu1X8vPGmRCg4lv8RSvQN t0rTrY1VC9hgsnBlxR1XrM0Fdf1O0GflyNY2hAj1pGNjOABdZ4+BVijjyAwPKhbPOL1m YIqdrxnLyK323MoA3uwxIlif9WpSOZokHe6eTUxHHOo5+D0s3kM6vt2jipVSAe6BxSfD /1Kg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@baylibre-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=rK7eTX7p; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w61-v6si3583332plb.502.2018.08.08.09.29.12; Wed, 08 Aug 2018 09:29:27 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@baylibre-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=rK7eTX7p; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728929AbeHHSrw (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 8 Aug 2018 14:47:52 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f67.google.com ([209.85.218.67]:42640 "EHLO mail-oi0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727062AbeHHSrw (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Aug 2018 14:47:52 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-f67.google.com with SMTP id b16-v6so4735070oic.9 for ; Wed, 08 Aug 2018 09:27:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=baylibre-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=YhaKZIqjDESWe1+0KnHRsmtXQnZ2TdYFXQzMb7Qioag=; b=rK7eTX7pZwFt2PI8Siw2vJ8Uy2Zrs/Dci6By62CMdd6RHvtof7k9w30Ir+66AAmFKB EpVN16JjoFu9e8NfFvHbg498V+8QSLKZBCnhfw/tlsLPDcUYns4OR3kl5jWFYgi0OWMV dTFlWAwMI4pJ5RCB7WucI5VLLNdgRMyImqplRo4qac4py8sWqcCvfHtjYHnz8PoJIj4v OHpO/nbTcyUZhKGL26yPHSSjCj4DBKK99ThT5UN3/OEAq3OiBQgY0PNkoEmzPKrXtsJz FhdO4CorjnkChpH4m7r+Ykg/nopZPtmXHqObpnOLFsaTcN7l9NKmEe64vuZmgJ8/bUTZ WxmQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YhaKZIqjDESWe1+0KnHRsmtXQnZ2TdYFXQzMb7Qioag=; b=UXGsb0afOGONLRSwNxGRaoBt+Y80PQUNFdPavTi9MbZSww4n2797aPTff2u4PzOSuw 7jerKMHSUrNn+qojO/cTGP/QS+4ctk7BLgaIkT3s0F8U3uopHOreaDIGlri3Tr85ifFy eBkw/eSm7nQ6VRVDTQ+GUQKaEdJ3cmpePANm2jCH37EWFulDjL6LSrYr2MG+RMzE9ADW 7wDyP5t13ley1gJcymsn1EZ4eoaAwsiQug93GW9upK/MejmDta8U7lqJuQAcoGYqlbvV dI3Tc2dYS2tI6MQJwqr5MYadqJPSahO0YJj1P+RpXWoSbTeWgw0ZuTYn+XhCKW4FW9b2 rcZw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlGkTr1MwusTNjE4wJ3MyzMOfU47J0QAmKCs36ygCjzABmpIDcbo lHkEDtBarGrBwxhTunJDYrJ+qNDczieOsvnRRq1nvg== X-Received: by 2002:aca:5e42:: with SMTP id s63-v6mr3421427oib.134.1533745645996; Wed, 08 Aug 2018 09:27:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:ac9:2c03:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Aug 2018 09:27:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20180808155548.s7p4xqsjywz3psrj@ninjato> References: <20180808153150.23444-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> <20180808155548.s7p4xqsjywz3psrj@ninjato> From: Bartosz Golaszewski Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 18:27:25 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/28] at24: remove at24_platform_data To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski , Jonathan Corbet , Sekhar Nori , Kevin Hilman , Russell King , Arnd Bergmann , Greg Kroah-Hartman , David Woodhouse , Brian Norris , Boris Brezillon , Marek Vasut , Richard Weinberger , Grygorii Strashko , "David S . Miller" , Srinivas Kandagatla , Naren , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Andrew Morton , Lukas Wunner , Dan Carpenter , Florian Fainelli , Ivan Khoronzhuk , Sven Van Asbroeck , Paolo Abeni , Alban Bedel , Rob Herring , David Lechner , Andrew Lunn , linux-doc , LKML , arm-soc , linux-i2c , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Linux-OMAP , netdev@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 2018-08-08 17:55 GMT+02:00 Wolfram Sang : > On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 05:31:22PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: >> From: Bartosz Golaszewski >> >> This is a follow-up to the previously rejected series[1] which partially >> removed the at24_platform_data structure. After further development and >> taking reviews into account, this series finally removes that struct >> completely but not without touching many different parts of the code >> base. >> >> Since I took over maintainership of the at24 driver I've been working >> towards removing at24_platform_data in favor for device properties. > > Wooha, nice work. I can't really comment on it but wondered how you want > to upstream it (after reviews)? Pull request of an immutable branch for > nvmem-tree sounds best to me. Then I could also pull it in if i2c needs > it. Probably same situation for arm-soc... > I initially wanted to merge small parts of it starting with v4.18, but there were some voices against merging APIs without users. I'm not sure how it should go in. There'll be a need for multiple immutable branches most probably... Bart