Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180808164402.GH7275@lunn.ch>
References: <20180808153150.23444-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> <20180808155548.s7p4xqsjywz3psrj@ninjato>
 <CAMpxmJXVNiyqF4qaYtNhPUG3mSZVdvBSGUqDYK-nh59BKeh=Gw@mail.gmail.com> <20180808164402.GH7275@lunn.ch>
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Date:   Wed, 8 Aug 2018 18:52:04 +0200
Message-ID: <CAMRc=McfSZQvdXgrKDagb_TE1g-WzEhSpst1z_o5Z994cv3MjA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/28] at24: remove at24_platform_data
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc:     Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
        Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
        Naren <naren.kernel@gmail.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org>,
        Sven Van Asbroeck <svendev@arcx.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Alban Bedel <albeu@free.fr>,
        Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
        David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>,
        linux-doc <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        arm-soc <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        linux-i2c <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
        Linux-OMAP <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

2018-08-08 18:44 GMT+02:00 Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 06:27:25PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>> 2018-08-08 17:55 GMT+02:00 Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>:
>> > On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 05:31:22PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>> >> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
>> >>
>> >> This is a follow-up to the previously rejected series[1] which partially
>> >> removed the at24_platform_data structure. After further development and
>> >> taking reviews into account, this series finally removes that struct
>> >> completely but not without touching many different parts of the code
>> >> base.
>> >>
>> >> Since I took over maintainership of the at24 driver I've been working
>> >> towards removing at24_platform_data in favor for device properties.
>> >
>> > Wooha, nice work. I can't really comment on it but wondered how you want
>> > to upstream it (after reviews)? Pull request of an immutable branch for
>> > nvmem-tree sounds best to me. Then I could also pull it in if i2c needs
>> > it. Probably same situation for arm-soc...
>> >
>>
>> I initially wanted to merge small parts of it starting with v4.18, but
>> there were some voices against merging APIs without users. I'm not
>> sure how it should go in. There'll be a need for multiple immutable
>> branches most probably...
>
> Hi Bartosz
>
> What this series does is show all the different parts are now
> available, and can be reviewed as a whole. Once that review is
> completed, merging in parts then becomes possible.
>
> It looks like you could probably merge the nvmem, mtd and net parts
> independently via there maintainers for 4.20, since i don't think
> there are any dependencies. The arm-soc changes in 4.21, and the
> removal of the platform data in 4.22?
>
>      Andrew

We need the first batch of SoC changes for the net part and then the
second batch depends on those net changes. Also: dragging the merge
for this over a year is a bit overkill.

Sekhar: I know you're usually provided with immutable branches from
framework maintainers for the SoC changes - is it ok for you to
provide the net maintainers with an immutable branch after applying
the first part of davinci board file changes?

Bart