Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp2165036imm; Thu, 9 Aug 2018 08:19:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPxqlDLuBUNHhFUrpWsNKHDFQ3HV1ykASPqWQtLlBoFv60zNcqJP4PnoIuvCFtV1brCHk8mg X-Received: by 2002:a63:4924:: with SMTP id w36-v6mr2604882pga.143.1533827963039; Thu, 09 Aug 2018 08:19:23 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1533827963; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=C4opqFOCFhIpICl5yxwyWqV7dbCYqr0STfCL4vBTR3wQOZEP8+JgQPOKDTna5HhqNH L4dBhHx8sv2kGXoLxrRYDRAMsuvmY+xbv1ftoY4WaOosfUr+RCuOdto/68CHsmSJ7T/e QwopYpPhAzz37SwenJBMRLy9zgAekM+h2B+WGlbZDV+r+Ckiv0YvpeEeiWfG4bS9g2mh ihehSZXz+TGLTaeTLFswmbnrzpasr6I5e8yw0rqdMdm3H6VYGHYDdKahHxGapMXeHYPG bGKpCmuwcHyWdXXElYMab2hlHKY0ocatOLcbi+AeyP1e5ltLMX08zSLYgZAKoSE7xNxU V4CQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :from:references:cc:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=SVIk3NFvU0lD0BvKOroxyVnkfmOrukXeeKCzvA8ZuLs=; b=tUnXt/oq91cTT6BSMuFoeAZSdjojQ01maVlBLm9EbiXNO9GIJj5rB0ConTVsERFTzf NN+Yp3C/5Dx7clXXhf8rCKfgoXb8TARqyMDx5zvsBpXsS2ZHf2FHIybOdzX9Qnk+6KZP 4XNkF4xA4gB7Or1+rZ3Qh2+XymfblTYR19OZbbulVJiHO7c3wZLMY7pi3v3Mhr31bDj0 l7RZFcG0QtCPKAKkJIJ1AMGveSjeSe9Mu3XhaPas/w0Qj8ieY3UWWftaI46182lGiFcC GBCn/dwjMKhQWxweDBVt0Q/EM2iPXc2eNofjJgJr+swZURtzdgicb7z5R2vxxW4K2Sbb 96BA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b2-v6si7295998pgc.541.2018.08.09.08.19.08; Thu, 09 Aug 2018 08:19:23 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732503AbeHIRni (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 9 Aug 2018 13:43:38 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:47624 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732330AbeHIRng (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Aug 2018 13:43:36 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w79FFvMO051548 for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2018 11:18:13 -0400 Received: from e14.ny.us.ibm.com (e14.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.204]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2krnmef8nq-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 09 Aug 2018 11:18:13 -0400 Received: from localhost by e14.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 9 Aug 2018 11:18:12 -0400 Received: from b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.23) by e14.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.201) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Thu, 9 Aug 2018 11:18:08 -0400 Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.108]) by b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w79FI6F610879286 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 9 Aug 2018 15:18:06 GMT Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 102F3B2066; Thu, 9 Aug 2018 11:17:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69461B2064; Thu, 9 Aug 2018 11:17:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from oc8043147753.ibm.com (unknown [9.60.75.213]) by b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 9 Aug 2018 11:17:28 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 04/22] s390/zcrypt: Integrate ap_asm.h into include/asm/ap.h. To: Cornelia Huck , Tony Krowiak Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, freude@de.ibm.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, kwankhede@nvidia.com, bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com, alifm@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com, jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com, pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com, berrange@redhat.com, fiuczy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, buendgen@de.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com References: <1533739472-7172-1-git-send-email-akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1533739472-7172-5-git-send-email-akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180809110645.33b20c1f.cohuck@redhat.com> From: Tony Krowiak Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 11:18:05 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180809110645.33b20c1f.cohuck@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18080915-0052-0000-0000-0000031C3344 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00009514; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000266; SDB=6.01071330; UDB=6.00551657; IPR=6.00850999; MB=3.00022614; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2018-08-09 15:18:10 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18080915-0053-0000-0000-00005DAB8798 Message-Id: <10a23890-5ad4-38bd-aece-def5940fec89@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-08-09_06:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1807170000 definitions=main-1808090157 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08/09/2018 05:06 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Wed, 8 Aug 2018 10:44:14 -0400 > Tony Krowiak wrote: > >> From: Harald Freudenberger >> >> Move all the inline functions from the ap bus header >> file ap_asm.h into the in-kernel api header file >> arch/s390/include/asm/ap.h so that KVM can make use >> of all the low level AP functions. >> >> Signed-off-by: Harald Freudenberger >> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger > You should add your own s-o-b if you are sending on patches written by > others (even if it does not matter in the end, when they are merged > through a different path anyway.) That's rather ironic given I was told in an internal review that I should not sign off on patches I did not write. > >> --- >> arch/s390/include/asm/ap.h | 284 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- >> drivers/s390/crypto/ap_asm.h | 261 ------------------------------------ >> drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.c | 21 +--- >> drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.h | 1 + >> drivers/s390/crypto/ap_card.c | 1 - >> drivers/s390/crypto/ap_queue.c | 1 - >> 6 files changed, 259 insertions(+), 310 deletions(-) >> delete mode 100644 drivers/s390/crypto/ap_asm.h >> >> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/ap.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/ap.h >> index c1bedb4..046e044 100644 >> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/ap.h >> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/ap.h >> @@ -47,6 +47,50 @@ struct ap_queue_status { >> }; >> >> /** >> + * ap_intructions_available() - Test if AP instructions are available. >> + * >> + * Returns 0 if the AP instructions are installed. > Stumbled over this when I was looking at the usage in patch 7: if I see > a function called '_available' return 0, I'd assume that whatever the > function tests for is *not* available. > > Rather call this function ap_instructions_check_availability() (and > keep the return code convention), or switch this to return 0 if not > available and !0 if available? > >> + */ >> +static inline int ap_instructions_available(void) >> +{ >> + register unsigned long reg0 asm ("0") = AP_MKQID(0, 0); >> + register unsigned long reg1 asm ("1") = -ENODEV; >> + register unsigned long reg2 asm ("2"); >> + >> + asm volatile( >> + " .long 0xb2af0000\n" /* PQAP(TAPQ) */ >> + "0: la %0,0\n" >> + "1:\n" >> + EX_TABLE(0b, 1b) >> + : "+d" (reg1), "=d" (reg2) >> + : "d" (reg0) >> + : "cc"); >> + return reg1; >> +}