Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp2294282imm; Thu, 9 Aug 2018 10:21:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPyYH7FjNnrqaknz8zFwqKN0hHGtFeSCHNX+71TFjl9HkfGqPBLcLaCWZw3I6lw5/F2FhnGh X-Received: by 2002:a63:bf08:: with SMTP id v8-v6mr2933041pgf.3.1533835289282; Thu, 09 Aug 2018 10:21:29 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1533835289; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=f9U27KTow33649Oc4dTbvBBWZ81Nye/EznfsVN54Kppa7ZZh+rb3oVUgmK8sJ1uMKa NRcdRo8ZMj4iLgP8Fv16mWx66HmcYFIfpBOoNvgehjXFWCBbbkll5oNGQCPLQLazjnCq zh2DJPxpI2Gg1JjZsyY2UmgRv1UloDTvATHttVxVnIJ8qsGBULzY+Uqt+EQttLik1bvU B7zr23NpWST68hb6K9lquG7cWrQGeebA0CxGD5HNoANDnMvNQIg3DeybdN8eP03SOdyo EGcauYyLBXwCZg/+W/0pz97rBxkzUT34ycRf6kKmaSZaW1U8f3uKvdgzVOIJ0DfUUuCP F0zA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature:arc-authentication-results; bh=IUTn/7Ft69NSuwqT7EL06ov7KVYywUssQb8ZEx9fLWo=; b=m2wPdF5OH4GYPESEoXKzqGLc24Z/R4TJ6+qWYVxwVQI8JUcAgUbYIEhb0SGqePaHeP blG85KQllfCQOiYJp8Obd/6ukQlsFTcv6uhC98utZL7qbL0rWiYIchCPP30brL2b7GNF 70lm0G8LUxUqofTvTPpOvbCXkxAlJozOXRfJKOXYBrDuxP55p3G4SI+K6TGKnHEoTvLj KEu++X42sElP/gpF5kSTcaEhPhS+M+dJFtj73OYHBUW8H12BdWdcY81NmLDChCUN6yRP NZmN1ipICRBQeSS4BoPXRapC/e3cJHSbBZqwE/0SJFiJIn/X4brtqQ5OF+venYXrMtHz IUBA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=DdlyQn2s; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s9-v6si5973553pgk.384.2018.08.09.10.21.14; Thu, 09 Aug 2018 10:21:29 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=DdlyQn2s; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732573AbeHITqG (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 9 Aug 2018 15:46:06 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f68.google.com ([209.85.221.68]:40468 "EHLO mail-wr1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732368AbeHITqG (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Aug 2018 15:46:06 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f68.google.com with SMTP id h15-v6so5799475wrs.7 for ; Thu, 09 Aug 2018 10:20:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; bh=IUTn/7Ft69NSuwqT7EL06ov7KVYywUssQb8ZEx9fLWo=; b=DdlyQn2sJuKY7nfD4FeXcQ5s6TI3OzihOHCstPdxBYVinlwuFWOQG/R2cdpwnYV7M+ SI9IwaTluiiaBCM2qLgfGFaHMfoAgCSS0+tApx99vnO16Z0iBl+QVhfudsTS468gYeSN TYm6lsgVfPCCXlh7sqYDBHV7CHuo2KfqBie/4= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; bh=IUTn/7Ft69NSuwqT7EL06ov7KVYywUssQb8ZEx9fLWo=; b=FiXDQSY0uMEmrTShE/4BLzEgU0UehKh21VR0SZ4KMf7OuQq8oRrsnEufb0fbi221ZF kWBhxDiHWNl2AMI643nLKWi3hkuEMafqCiTej2G47AEU7Bx+YxMCCqk0A9RzRaBpJ5Cb /mBiYTzrpXUqXlDDZoJbZFHloXwOpPn6tIXNtFCFfsxin/aJHAAh92jKkNmrYLYBZH1g jKG9yX0aKCnU1O/ZpM+VKyjFfDKO/bAQw1/HwQk68eKkjWzFw50R53hipO9fqQLQ2jy1 iDDT3kqeV9Sc3DG/vhgZgttsVujmFCYWzo1UKRUPNccz5wSm8DhfxM68wIStoqzD4WxX tQ2Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlGLQV6Q4+AkDgvtWTnyc1fjHV9EfnSV8pEB+CTOnfBqD68O9ah3 Va5Hwv6KU310mJwKcuEdSlj3I/018K/NhpBR X-Received: by 2002:adf:9443:: with SMTP id 61-v6mr1930785wrq.193.1533835215037; Thu, 09 Aug 2018 10:20:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([45.76.138.171]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u4-v6sm1815056wro.47.2018.08.09.10.20.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Aug 2018 10:20:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Leo Yan To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" , Daniel Lezcano , Vincent Guittot , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux PM Cc: Leo Yan Subject: [RESEND PATCH v1 0/2] Optimization CPU idle state impacted by tick Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 01:20:01 +0800 Message-Id: <1533835203-5789-1-git-send-email-leo.yan@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org After Rafael's patch series 'sched/cpuidle: Idle loop rework' has been merged in mainline kernel, it perfectly resolved the Powernightmares issue [1] with not stopping the tick during the idle loop; we verified this patch series on Arm platform (96boards Hikey620 with octa CA53 CPUs) with the rt-app [2] program to generate workloads: a single task with below combinded configurations with period 5ms and duty cycle 1%/3%/5%/10%/20%/30%/40%. After run these testing cases, we found the CPU cannot stay in deepest idle state as expected, the issues essentialy are related with sched tick: The prominent issue is the criteria for decision stopping tick; now the criteria is checking expected interval is less than TICK_USEC, but this doesn't consider from the perspective of idle state parameters, so we can observe the CPU even has enough sleeping time but it cannot run into deepest idle state; this is very serious for some specific ducy cycle cases. Another issue is after tick keeping running in idle state, the tick can heavily impact on 'menu' governor metrics, especially it will introduce many noise for next event correction factors. This patch series tries to fix these two issues; patch 0001 wants to define a time point to distinguish for stopping or not, this time point consideres the factors from tick period and the maximum target residency and use prediction period to compare this time point to decide if need to stop tick. Patch 0002 wants to always to give compensation for tick event so that dimiss the tick impaction on correction factors for next time prediction. Blow table are comparison results for testing cases between without and with this patch series; we run the test case with single task with period 5ms with different dutycycle, the total running time is 10s. Based on the tracing log, we do statistics for all CPUs for all idle states duration, the unit is second (s), on Hikey board the result shows the C2 state (the CPU deepest state) selection improvement. Some notations are used in the table: state: C0: WFI; C1: CPU OFF; C2: Cluster OFF All testing cases have single task with 5ms period: Without patches With patches Difference ----------------------------- ----------------------------- ------------------------------- Duty cycle C0 C1 C2 C0 C1 C2 C0 C1 C2 1% 0.218589 4.208460 87.995606 0.119723 0.847116 91.940569 -0.098866 -3.361344 +3.944963 3% 0.801521 5.031361 86.444753 0.147346 0.820276 91.761191 -0.654175 -4.211085 +5.316438 5% 0.590236 2.733048 88.284541 0.149237 1.042383 90.490482 -0.440999 -1.690665 +2.205941 10% 0.601922 6.282368 84.899870 0.169491 1.304985 89.725754 -0.432431 -4.977383 +4.825884 20% 1.381870 8.531687 80.627691 0.307390 3.302562 86.686887 -1.074480 -5.229125 +6.059196 30% 1.785221 6.974483 81.083312 0.548050 5.319929 83.551747 -1.237171 -1.654554 +2.468435 40% 1.403247 6.474203 80.577176 0.467686 6.366482 81.983384 -0.935561 -0.107721 +1.406208 Leo Yan (2): cpuidle: menu: Correct the criteria for stopping tick cpuidle: menu: Dismiss tick impaction on correction factors drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) -- 2.7.4