Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 10 Aug 2018 10:40:55 +0800
From:   Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc:     Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Marek =?UTF-8?B?QmVow7pu?= <marek.behun@nic.cz>,
        Tomas Hlavacek <tomas.hlavacek@nic.cz>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: mvneta: use the correct napi pointer
Message-ID: <20180810104055.0f009ed0@xhacker.debian>
In-Reply-To: <20180809121308.GC16359@lunn.ch>
References: <20180809200242.1166f86c@xhacker.debian>
        <20180809121308.GC16359@lunn.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: None (protection.outlook.com: synaptics.com does not designate
 permitted sender hosts)
SpamDiagnosticOutput: 1:99
SpamDiagnosticMetadata: NSPM
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Aug 2018 02:43:48.4259 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: f642414a-18d8-4f89-882e-08d5fe6b1ae9
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 335d1fbc-2124-4173-9863-17e7051a2a0e
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR0301MB1571
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi,

On Thu, 9 Aug 2018 14:13:08 +0200 Andrew Lunn wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 08:02:42PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > if neta_armada3700 is true, the mvneta_pcpu_port's napi is invalid, we
> > should use pp->napi instead. Fix mvneta_config_rss() with this method.
> > Although we can fix mvneta_rx_hwbm() and mvneta_rx_swbm() in the same
> > manner, the napi parm of mvneta_poll() is always correct, so we can
> > pass the correct napi param to mvneta_rx_hwbm() and mvneta_rx_swbm()
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>  
> 
> Hi Jisheng
> 
> How does this differ from

oops, I didn't monitor the net-next tree recently, glad to see it's fixed.
But the mvneta_config_rss() also need the fix. Since your patch is already
merged, so I will submit one separate patch to fix mvneta_config_rss().

Thanks a lot,
Jisheng

> 
> commit 7a86f05faf112463cfbbdfd222012e247de461a1
> Author: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
> Date:   Wed Jul 18 18:10:50 2018 +0200
> 
>     net: ethernet: mvneta: Fix napi structure mixup on armada 3700
>     
>     The mvneta Ethernet driver is used on a few different Marvell SoCs.
>     Some SoCs have per cpu interrupts for Ethernet events. Some SoCs have
>     a single interrupt, independent of the CPU. The driver handles this by
>     having a per CPU napi structure when there are per CPU interrupts, and
>     a global napi structure when there is a single interrupt.
>     
>     When the napi core calls mvneta_poll(), it passes the napi
>     instance. This was not being propagated through the call chain, and
>     instead the per-cpu napi instance was passed to napi_gro_receive()
>     call. This breaks when there is a single global napi instance.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
>     Fixes: 2636ac3cc2b4 ("net: mvneta: Add network support for Armada 3700 SoC")
>     Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>
>     Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> 
> which is already in net-next, and i hope net?
> 
>       Andrew