Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp328114imm; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 12:01:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPwHd0Jcw8LMLAfj+Xith1urYOPlZUB8DCP4m0R4X+hjdns0h27RAuIusiCGWfUF0e6BxKH+ X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:6b46:: with SMTP id g6-v6mr7306882plt.251.1533927711642; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 12:01:51 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1533927711; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=G8uDqEBzE2gKJr1QJRCrHagShZYGAofgz1jfcYpf56xtz1NEenSQFNH/+IEF6n03mU nqvumcxLz93w1FpEg1Xfpx2JPOWTHoZYlchL7DhEPHm1urxro1txOdh7Ed+Kpol8whtE NQ21w1YYJWLt1+J7pNYzz67epO6I9Jn+oIcBU+JJS+n9DeKg+JWGQI5+Enj6N3Yuf37j 3CvUBMCXANCJvg2XiO3v8ykWB9PIRYd24I4TfJ3VG6bUDwD1KOdL+VBVbLReO81xHu6d qwjzPoZa2uLdxQFFNqNlskxG/cpudb78CWscEFMPaG3SD7YSNGnTV37M1Dr6ySg1KaEw mS6g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id :dkim-signature:arc-authentication-results; bh=tJ73woDsSOQ6XdnD+ZTKNgcED52qiHbqNmezz/5jN68=; b=LooGAJwiXasJaUj0Np4fPz+gW/2/fkZfqngF2IM0+hDwPlL6ZPPiTenexdLFon3hFM IcgDojROllISocoy0JISJI7TLnTMiStpzMRMA1tmLZpkriCTUoLGSz/CbBzm0u1JGQdo TDsHCD8B+22/PxTw4cFWtBzMVjatcpjk2EBxv/NW/rOv+sYivGzmnrWX06u9QaHcFCAh geFMEVX6tyu5HMFva7LjL6pcVK0Y3ii87niYqWEgwiFnUcL+LSEF3ycfzbEqCsKrCmL0 s1mgdxpPQjVJgLBv96lY3e5/EFJO+a9F48483yupQIv8arFnVUCL5FxvtMRvfT/Tzato 0+Yw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@hansenpartnership.com header.s=20151216 header.b=QSFj8qRL; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=hansenpartnership.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 1-v6si8301393plr.148.2018.08.10.12.01.36; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 12:01:51 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@hansenpartnership.com header.s=20151216 header.b=QSFj8qRL; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=hansenpartnership.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727087AbeHJVbz (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 10 Aug 2018 17:31:55 -0400 Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([66.63.167.143]:58686 "EHLO bedivere.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726162AbeHJVbz (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Aug 2018 17:31:55 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8255C8EE251; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 12:00:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bedivere.hansenpartnership.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id teufXgcB4bEI; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 12:00:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [153.66.254.194] (unknown [50.35.68.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E6A6F8EE092; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 12:00:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=hansenpartnership.com; s=20151216; t=1533927648; bh=RK+koxzZBfJyGPY745W9ywrtJ38uXj7b2xbtE04W9wQ=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=QSFj8qRL15PaggKyipHIaBoWJBQuwePAdtZyELR/Vya1xih302AfnhthMtI9Pb0hz H8snM+paKxDDG8m9Dax2Z17/Wn54UIIcwSYnXGA1ta/EYUqqDVDNFVfdeXuUz4pN3V t1EystNB0dyTG2BaoxYW68rTXrTR0Euc56sHHkp8= Message-ID: <1533927647.3143.7.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] tpm: add support for nonblocking operation From: James Bottomley To: Tadeusz Struk , Jarkko Sakkinen Cc: flihp@twobit.us, jgg@ziepe.ca, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 12:00:47 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: <153367365951.18015.11320230309813817454.stgit@tstruk-mobl1.jf.intel.com> <153367366969.18015.14742040525393494830.stgit@tstruk-mobl1.jf.intel.com> <20180810174320.GV4692@linux.intel.com> <1533926908.3143.6.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2018-08-10 at 11:56 -0700, Tadeusz Struk wrote: > On 08/10/2018 11:48 AM, James Bottomley wrote: > > On Fri, 2018-08-10 at 11:21 -0700, Tadeusz Struk wrote: > > > and the feedback I got from Jason was: > > > > > > "I wonder if it is worth creating this when the first file is > > > opened.. Lots of systems have TPMs but few use the userspace.." > > > > > > so I changed this to allocate the WQ on first open. I think it > > > makes sense, but I leave it to you to decide. > > > > If the reason is to not create a wq unless it's needed, shouldn't > > the condition actually be first open with flag O_NONBLOCK? > > > > Not really because one can do: > > int fd = open("/dev/tpm0", O_RDWR); > fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, O_NONBLOCK); so move the condition to first need to queue ... James