Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp469101imm; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 14:57:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPwafFokeRUw45kQG6Ux7HqWsKpudLOXIraQQsveYz/IHBIBo1ueJK54QScof4tpKKfCS9Vq X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:a40b:: with SMTP id p11-v6mr7742162plq.228.1533938220535; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 14:57:00 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1533938220; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=QgHHlGzZZ4TgbcirTa6mjA/9B17dHC044mQfUUDEJjNxyMR238ln2T2acUJjkW6I/V IZOY4+wkXfGfHGDeNw/lM5HoK664rFQsxsNHC4NR6QxNwqD3tdrpj3y7CF6q+7TzuYkT RXgJ93HrnX/x0ImBCa4whZyl1hrgOa1VidzsSiVnSllXl/eyFZi0Om7NkcxUNUkrClK4 qGNdH9w/qDp3BgsgNfV+YAEThDhf7Wpww9O28r0yweLzGu0YReL+ZVZDanPraN6sRdoy a4qnQjaZy5ac2mzaNPcgPJiqu2AP/oW1sekvh4Z5uV1RlvrPAn5TRKWydJ5ssuAgt8zn tHgQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=Z0fwvBjK/vhko80D9qlRnuU1JQwHLv8owOQaQ+OaGR0=; b=JHKiBnD02gojq0aQcOxEMxYsx/lgr4xopAV0kgmPWjCDJ8m+zHp5SZ6D0iRNamCUmW P6lu/YKsYUrHOn3PbjTzmwh2c2n8XFheHt7L0Ax4W+T/0RjFDCLdI3SSaKEZtd7eJR+m 5LLoEpdwBriNKn04EHQ1pyaIZn7MLr60ec6YonNUyrqCUgIgWLZnEYBLQ56XoifbZ/dg wXqFqV0weh6QQooDbKamnZ1NmXvFbyLThwDNs5kDlRIQAKCdAbuyK9eGrC+93mIy+aN3 lDnXLObLYwf4diCMIn+k2MV2XhpXmnsuEhTr15wW7hqY0z3xCxQNk8EgfqIIFmsePCAH pBOQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@tobin.cc header.s=fm3 header.b=WWOOEBwo; dkim=pass header.i=@messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=GyXc+eTG; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e4-v6si10897264pgk.630.2018.08.10.14.56.45; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 14:57:00 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@tobin.cc header.s=fm3 header.b=WWOOEBwo; dkim=pass header.i=@messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=GyXc+eTG; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727191AbeHKA0B (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 10 Aug 2018 20:26:01 -0400 Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.25]:35137 "EHLO wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725754AbeHKA0A (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Aug 2018 20:26:00 -0400 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9FA821E; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 17:54:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 10 Aug 2018 17:54:18 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tobin.cc; h=cc :content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm3; bh=Z0fwvBjK/vhko80D9qlRnuU1JQwHLv8owOQaQ+OaGR0=; b=WWOOEBwo jJ3B13KJlW5m8640j4/jS/Rf8zZivhKz5ImrRtFZPQLY0H2Jsa7+kK0K9dQZ5RoU IHh5CAJNbBfN+A86bu3WvXXxiqzViVR2g/T+auqqaP+DUUVhqs7209+T9J/+XLaF e6aUIYFjvqAQWAyTtb2FSCiGc/i+vVuNPk65Iymdu3BPEc/lrcjwAcna59QHAGI1 p2/wgTDHs8nlctJZbL55/pkkacM+WAzWn/lk4uqvbUveH2sMChu8dqaORHzhN5VW kOYtjplit8/EnmKDGv2kjqS/y3wwAxpf91rt5JJub+lgIllK97hOFUc/mHIY9KFi bi0PCWNsiq4u7Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=Z0fwvBjK/vhko80D9qlRnuU1JQwHL v8owOQaQ+OaGR0=; b=GyXc+eTGVMro56QyC3fk5Nhzm6UtuNPKx9jmi6Q5uvqXR XixFsipoWjUjFhcdL5My6J3bm8k7IC1RFe8uBbxdisLnhnQwzz+c9K44BiBUXCaO g2sxLeTfdpbjC/ke8oTIIslZTPcEKkUhyQClsEsCXK+YTD6F2WygdmkJaVb28SZF NyhIBKW6pZK+vVxat0XXrv0hUfpnj7mVttk8ytJjvUByLfkZ7iub9tY68Sd6Yemj NAthvc+tbQBJ08td3kMkiXVbKnfZTknDpoR5gtoFFcbJ7gufEOjulOfcYQ3roCaf t4Zz8GdO7FY/7uXpwwtKnLCrI3RloWc5xA0eKL02g== X-ME-Proxy: X-ME-Sender: Received: from localhost (124-169-145-41.dyn.iinet.net.au [124.169.145.41]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6955BE455F; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 17:54:15 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2018 07:54:12 +1000 From: "Tobin C. Harding" To: Jonathan Corbet Cc: Daniel Borkmann , Alexei Starovoitov , Alexei Starovoitov , "David S. Miller" , Kees Cook , Andy Lutomirski , Will Drewry , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] Convert filter.txt to RST Message-ID: <20180810215412.GM32374@eros> References: <20180809052328.27942-1-me@tobin.cc> <20180809060734.rtqqu4sexbwzuqmm@ast-mbp> <20180809072753.GF32374@eros> <80bdc251-9f57-602f-6536-b34651684bb7@iogearbox.net> <20180810014636.GJ32374@eros> <20180810065752.2ab5473d@lwn.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180810065752.2ab5473d@lwn.net> X-Mailer: Mutt 1.9.4 (2018-02-28) User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 06:57:52AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Fri, 10 Aug 2018 11:46:36 +1000 > "Tobin C. Harding" wrote: > > > Thanks for clarifying. My understanding is now; this is a case where > > checkpatch is too verbose and we do not actually need to add a specific > > license identifier to the documentation files (new or otherwise). They > > get an implicit GPLv2. > > The objective actually is to have SPDX tags in all files in the kernel. > That includes documentation, even though people, as always, care less > about the docs than they do the code. > > As I understood it, the complaint with the tags you put in wasn't their > existence, it was your putting GPLv2+ rather than straight GPLv2. In the > absence of information to the contrary, you really have to assume the > latter, since that's the overall license for the kernel. Righto, thanks Jon. GPLv0 tags going in for v3 Tobin