Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262635AbTI1Rhs (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:37:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262649AbTI1Rhs (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:37:48 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:673 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262635AbTI1Rhr (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:37:47 -0400 Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:37:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Geert Uytterhoeven cc: Bernardo Innocenti , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.0-test6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Bernardo Innocenti: > > o GCC 3.3.x/3.4 compatiblity fix in include/linux/init.h > > This change breaks 2.95 for some source files, because doesn't > include . Do you want to have the missing include added to > , or to the individual source files that need it? Interesting. I'm pretty sure I did a "make allyesconfig" just before the test6 release, so apparently x86 includes it indirectly through some path, and so it only shows up on m68k and arm? This, btw, is a pretty common thing. I wonder what we could do to make sure that different architectures wouldn't have so different include file structures. It's happened _way_ too often. Any ideas? Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/