Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262654AbTI1Rko (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:40:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262656AbTI1Rko (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:40:44 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:31907 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262654AbTI1Rkm (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:40:42 -0400 Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:40:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: pavel@ucw.cz cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?kernel_list?= , =?ISO-8859-1?Q??= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Patrick_Mochel?= Subject: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Re:_pm:_Revert_swsusp_to_2.6.0-test3_?= In-Reply-To: <20030928100620.5FAA63450F@smtp-out2.iol.cz> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 28 Sep 2003 pavel@ucw.cz wrote: > > This should not be warring patch. Pat > already has variant in his tree, > feel free to pull from him - but it > would be nice to have working swsusp > in -test6. --p Ok. In that case, can we remove the '#if 0' blocks entirely, or at least add a big comment on why they are there but disabled? I'd also like to have some kind of readme or similar on the different suspend/resume issues, and why we have two different approaches. Hmm? Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/