Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262692AbTI1TI6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Sep 2003 15:08:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262695AbTI1TI6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Sep 2003 15:08:58 -0400 Received: from gprs147-229.eurotel.cz ([160.218.147.229]:39809 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262692AbTI1TI4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Sep 2003 15:08:56 -0400 Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 21:06:57 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Nigel Cunningham Cc: Linus Torvalds , Patrick Mochel , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: pm: Revert swsusp to 2.6.0-test3 Message-ID: <20030928190657.GJ359@elf.ucw.cz> References: <1064774937.18769.9.camel@laptop-linux> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1064774937.18769.9.camel@laptop-linux> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > Could you also give me some clear direction on where you want me to put > my 2.4 port. Should it go in kernel/power, or somewhere else? (I'm > assuming you don't want 3 versions of swsusp?!). I'd like to put it in > the right place when I start populating swsusp25.bkbits.net, so you're > not pulling changesets later that only move the code around (I know bk > reduces the cost, but...). I believe kernel/power is the right place. And no, 3 versions would not be good thing. Pavel -- When do you have a heart between your knees? [Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/