Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp2818404imm; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 00:37:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPxydvvCGbxNd59yUlWPxmL04Jb4+g8Qc975MKu3bOxfMgLHvNETDe8RKGwthbYY4PPx0vsI X-Received: by 2002:a63:d20e:: with SMTP id a14-v6mr16004813pgg.226.1534145833185; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 00:37:13 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1534145833; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=M/sIt30ua3DZAa/kMf4zCgmV5br7ggejXTd/utqjWev19OgYYc6kqZ+ZAuTD/bpCpX w094lAlCxIDkGQxfYtfeEoXKFyaARKe1SFbHxVGdC2YaYXUQyhbP5a4+IVVgIY34KEeZ jZKQdUulUYjrAz6UfpA71WkHJ1yflv/oz5dJPos3C4twD8UjixJAXGQDdXObD1T4jC1T N5j4amMlj/ogP20RkBgcJBTVUeAr6FJwBjY6yFjpU856nmyiYSLg4IuahqoZ4O0Xz/gj RdSnEDxU5nKJ7ygDret+Y4iaHKJju5EwM0sY0wi5hxKKx9PDcUfyRnm02LMEtKgePx5w WgkA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=owTxuRfbN2aTwYFFUfhqbmXgtr8HWJfq2o21EuM9O2w=; b=IFtRq6cr+HoGg8UMe6TkG4ruOGoGDGNjw2E4m/RXtF95umV6P3g1mOSnNKVR32SPlq m4wTOwYquWqEzoQUhGnhj+oHDrsgl9q1a7pUmLhBrkh6VLgYoJMWG/4kZioLCjBtsws4 IhIP8fYRXRA3ggLR/AkvVomebQr7Dd6a/m9fXXvf00H8Y5b2vCG5u1Wn+yjp3OIVkXfI crLdMYkmfD9Q6upb0X445BWMMLtEaUsNWSJ+z6bTmThmHdhQibWpkgV7k4GVJf3xsrG0 lYpPIoRjU2QE82fxyJ3CJwzSk56mKV+yJQvVM5cygNiP1kMj5AqQ+4nCiuDBfwoI9bYk onow== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=bQUxk0rd; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d65-v6si17499064pgc.524.2018.08.13.00.36.56; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 00:37:13 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=bQUxk0rd; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728358AbeHMJy3 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 13 Aug 2018 05:54:29 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:46298 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726704AbeHMJy3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Aug 2018 05:54:29 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f46.google.com (mail-wm0-f46.google.com [74.125.82.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B36921834; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 07:13:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1534144411; bh=TK1/mfdmnFRbnq1msxDHxVDyTJhU7I5h2Az6/V2GkWc=; h=In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=bQUxk0rdogg9HNcGUuPSzRfNWaaC0j7HGNjA6gM2hc6/3bh0TQwjEOaFenGqxGQqn aN5tCfeWPLBgtBmxwxhFXTxyCVbnrfG6/bzAH5CTJdKJx3hreExTsJrZcA5yJXhy4N 38NTZ7jBBHrntkOX83wH/AJT8eY9pHgSqfnUwTH4= Received: by mail-wm0-f46.google.com with SMTP id t25-v6so7712578wmi.3; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 00:13:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlEW+m9cBR39pNEEYaky0jhsiVf+fowUKiAQcCdSTDdVsO3uObtk 6eBLZmGdcwNWvx0qpNUd6oILLGQ/LBO2HORn5r0= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:9c56:: with SMTP id f83-v6mr6820845wme.135.1534144409782; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 00:13:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:adf:9141:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 00:13:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20180806160933.6578-1-krzk@kernel.org> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 09:13:29 +0200 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ARM: dts: exynos: Add missing used PMIC regulators on Exynos5422 Odroid boards To: Anand Moon Cc: Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Kukjin Kim , devicetree , linux-arm-kernel , "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kernel , Marek Szyprowski , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Chanwoo Choi Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 13 August 2018 at 08:37, Anand Moon wrote: > Hi Krzysztof, > > On Sun, 12 Aug 2018 at 18:55, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> >> On 11 August 2018 at 08:39, Anand Moon wrote: >> > Hi Krzysztof, >> > >> > These patches should also be ported to u-boot to enable PMIC. >> > >> > I was just looking into S2MPS11B data sheet >> > According to the 1.2 Key Features of S2MPS11 >> > >> > BUCK1, BUCK2, BUCK3, BUCK4, BUCK6 have (0.65 V to 1.6 V) min /max range. >> > BUCK5 have (0.65 V to 2.0 V) min /max range. >> > BUCK7 have (1.2 V to 1.5 V) min / max range. >> > BUCK8 have (1.8 V to 2.1 V) min / max range. >> > BUCK10 have (0.75 V to 1.4 V) min / max range. >> > >> > BUCKBOST9 (3.0 V to 3.75 V) min / max range. >> > >> > LDO1, LDO6, LDO11, LDO22, LDO23, LDO27, LDO35 (0.8 V to 2.375 V) min / max range >> > >> > LDO2, LDO3, LDO5, LDO7, LDO9, LDO10, LD012, LDO13, LDO14, LDO15, >> > LDO16, LDO17, LDO18, LDO19, LDO20, LD021, LDO24, LDO25, LDO26, >> > LDO28, LDO29, LDO30, LDO31, LDO32, LDO33, LDO34, LDO36, LDO37, LDO38 >> > (0.8 V to 3.95 V) min / max range >> > >> > I am aware off we have configures the min/max range as per board schematics. >> > but each regulator support dynamic voltage scale and have different >> > turn on/off voltage and current rating. >> > >> > So why are we not setting the regulator-min-microvolt / >> > regulator-max-microvolt as per datasheets. >> > Please correct me if I am wrong. >> >> Which regulators are not configured as in datasheet? >> >> Best regards, >> Krzysztof > > Almost all the regulator have some miss default match of min/max setting. > I have tried to adjust the setting on top your above patches. > > I am attaching my patch diff for testing. > I have have perform some stress testing and found no issue at my end. All the regulators you touched in this patch have proper setting of min and max values. They are configured to the values required by hardware, as in schematics. Best regards, Krzysztof