Received: by 2002:a4a:311b:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id k27-v6csp3962626ooa; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 22:12:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPwVs0CPP0Z1d+3voIX15WQUnJPCDpadjIfMp3v5Wp5L4aa702KvBNUtGups8JgIxLATFLff X-Received: by 2002:a65:4cc5:: with SMTP id n5-v6mr19633060pgt.451.1534223548392; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 22:12:28 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1534223548; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=OI7amjJq7u6wA8mh9oj3UBo6HrAXJRqwJTT3tyaXsS9Rc/223a76RKRnOBiF1xr9yo WYzx9kYLkuGeswEG6+sUB3N3j/zADKvbm//GiuANEW5rLDcKFS6HBTQOm7eP0pawubh3 vFZjm2tCFunpPrRVL2XF1YcCJosD8YZuhXMud//BEFaySGcLdJhrTQj3JVwdIELwVA5q +9RsrfjHGzCAXarzsMSN2RKTN6yj/aOtTQGmCpHw6imm0QPQcPIJxRjEXZPw4bK1tA1G X0QA7A/4pfyHG0xF2HGZXiU/8P3vaGBGiGURE856o2yFHDFshyb1PGzePBNfz9LM3pxQ BOZw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :references:subject:cc:to:mime-version:user-agent:from:date :message-id:arc-authentication-results; bh=I+jVukqVI0BA48LWfh9YqNl/o+gvvGvTvL50K/TZL48=; b=M8jEyUWMcvaKQ7l34dMEtOMAfjnT5+MuyE5huBMUMoht86tXNXMazLddrPJzF5X+wv G8I2JcCRdLrRunCxfRnwM3XEHiV1rpjEzf6QNKRjb7344nFRVW6M/uavWvmD4NSSREae FYOSDh72qYGR2DNm4KGp2dwMA/RqkXgssjzmiENPdikQ9yR2NSOmLzRoOE4nv2RiSTT2 526e5sANMlJI+GWZzkmAXajcZ3HlsELo6+zMNxEzaBZNY6+WT8OiHCaDDYJMVBUlDNds wSIgquz6UqZJvWPirOl6SnxxcumniY1Icihsse1nRtZVavF5yckJwgrxnKVhQg3qlkoz KfuA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 42-v6si19298097plf.488.2018.08.13.22.12.13; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 22:12:28 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731755AbeHNHmm (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 14 Aug 2018 03:42:42 -0400 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]:10718 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725999AbeHNHml (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Aug 2018 03:42:41 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS414-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 28973F9F81189; Tue, 14 Aug 2018 12:57:11 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.177.29.68) by DGGEMS414-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.214) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.399.0; Tue, 14 Aug 2018 12:57:10 +0800 Message-ID: <5B726124.5030308@huawei.com> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 12:57:08 +0800 From: zhong jiang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joe Perches CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ia64: Use ARRAY_SIZE to replace its implementation References: <1534214814-9043-1-git-send-email-zhongjiang@huawei.com> <1534214814-9043-2-git-send-email-zhongjiang@huawei.com> <81ae2b1b7ea395217dbf3494457a232bdfdc79c5.camel@perches.com> In-Reply-To: <81ae2b1b7ea395217dbf3494457a232bdfdc79c5.camel@perches.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.177.29.68] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2018/8/14 12:45, Joe Perches wrote: > On Tue, 2018-08-14 at 10:46 +0800, zhong jiang wrote: >> We prefer to ARRAY_SIZE rather than duplicating its implementation. >> So just replace it. > [] >> diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/perfmon.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/perfmon.c > [] >> @@ -4645,7 +4645,7 @@ static char *pfmfs_dname(struct dentry *dentry, char *buffer, int buflen) >> /* 32 */PFM_CMD(pfm_write_ibrs, PFM_CMD_PCLRWS, PFM_CMD_ARG_MANY, pfarg_dbreg_t, NULL), >> /* 33 */PFM_CMD(pfm_write_dbrs, PFM_CMD_PCLRWS, PFM_CMD_ARG_MANY, pfarg_dbreg_t, NULL) >> }; >> -#define PFM_CMD_COUNT (sizeof(pfm_cmd_tab)/sizeof(pfm_cmd_desc_t)) >> +#define PFM_CMD_COUNT ARRAY_SIZE(pfm_cmd_tab) > Better would be to remove the #define altogether and change > the one place where it's used to ARRAY_SIZE(...) > --- > arch/ia64/kernel/perfmon.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/perfmon.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/perfmon.c > index a9d4dc6c0427..08ece2c7b6e1 100644 > --- a/arch/ia64/kernel/perfmon.c > +++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/perfmon.c > @@ -4645,7 +4645,6 @@ static pfm_cmd_desc_t pfm_cmd_tab[]={ > /* 32 */PFM_CMD(pfm_write_ibrs, PFM_CMD_PCLRWS, PFM_CMD_ARG_MANY, pfarg_dbreg_t, NULL), > /* 33 */PFM_CMD(pfm_write_dbrs, PFM_CMD_PCLRWS, PFM_CMD_ARG_MANY, pfarg_dbreg_t, NULL) > }; > -#define PFM_CMD_COUNT (sizeof(pfm_cmd_tab)/sizeof(pfm_cmd_desc_t)) > > static int > pfm_check_task_state(pfm_context_t *ctx, int cmd, unsigned long flags) > @@ -4770,7 +4769,7 @@ sys_perfmonctl (int fd, int cmd, void __user *arg, int count) > */ > if (unlikely(pmu_conf == NULL)) return -ENOSYS; > > - if (unlikely(cmd < 0 || cmd >= PFM_CMD_COUNT)) { > + if (unlikely(cmd < 0 || cmd >= ARRAY_SIZE(pfm_cmd_tab)) { > DPRINT(("invalid cmd=%d\n", cmd)); > return -EINVAL; > } > > > . > Thank you for suggestion. That's indeed better if just one palce use it. I will repost in v2. Sincerely, zhong jiang