Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262973AbTI2Kwz (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2003 06:52:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262982AbTI2Kwz (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2003 06:52:55 -0400 Received: from [134.153.36.129] ([134.153.36.129]:56525 "EHLO hardcopy.esd.mun.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262973AbTI2Kwy (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2003 06:52:54 -0400 From: Stephen Anthony To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Possible regression with 2.6.0-test6 Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 08:22:09 -0230 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200309290822.09859.stephena@users.sourceforge.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I've noticed that test6 isn't as 'smooth' as test5. Specifically, if I open an nedit window and use the cursor down key to scroll down through text, there is some jerkiness. At this point I've noticed that CPU use goes to 1% or more. A similar problem happens with Opera (web browser), but of course the CPU usage is higher, which is expected. When I go back to test5, scrolling in nedit is smoother, and CPU never goes above 0.6%. Note that the speed that text moves is the same in both, but the test6 version 'jumps' and 'stops' for a little bit. Hence my describing it as jerky. I know its not much to go on, but it is a noticable difference, at least to me. Since this new release has tweaked interactivity patches, I'm wondering if this has anything to do with it. System is a fully updated Mandrake 9.1, but I don't think that would matter. CPU is P4-2.4GHz with 768 MB RAM, and NVidia video card. Steve - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/