Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 17:00:05 +0200
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
       Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>,
       Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] check headers for complete includes, etc.
Message-ID: <20030929150005.GA24375@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309281213240.4929-100000@callisto> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309281035370.6307-100000@home.osdl.org> <20030928184642.GA1681@mars.ravnborg.org> <20030928191622.GA16921@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <20030928193150.GA3074@mars.ravnborg.org> <20030928194431.GB16921@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <20030929133624.GA14611@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <20030929145057.GA1002@mars.ravnborg.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20030929145057.GA1002@mars.ravnborg.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 29 September 2003 16:50:57 +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 03:36:24PM +0200, J?rn Engel wrote:
> > First version of the script.  Seems to work, but it catches a lot,
> > maybe too much.
> 
> What about adding a negative list, so headerfiles that we decide
> shall not be able to compile stand-alone are filtered away.
> But new headers are added.

Would work.  But I'd prefer to have that information inside the header
files, under some syntax.

/* attr: indirect header */

Is this acceptable?

J?rn

-- 
Happiness isn't having what you want, it's wanting what you have.
-- unknown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/