Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 15 Aug 2018 15:12:23 -0500
From:   Dan Rue <dan.rue@linaro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org,
        patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk,
        lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.18 00/79] 4.18.1-stable review
Message-ID: <20180815201223.j6rhtk4asx7hfntp@xps.therub.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org,
        patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk,
        lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
References: <20180814171336.799314117@linuxfoundation.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20180814171336.799314117@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 07:16:19PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.18.1 release.
> There are 79 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Thu Aug 16 17:13:16 UTC 2018.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Our systems are swamped with these RCs and mainline today, but since I
see these are being tagged I wanted to get results out based on the data
that we do have. We manually screened the results and will follow up if
we notice anything subsequently. Caveat applies to all stable branches.

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm and x86_64.

Summary
------------------------------------------------------------------------

kernel: 4.18.1-rc2
git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
git branch: linux-4.18.y
git commit: 8105f76febd464c5c5cf4cd4647e42b724ed728c
git describe: v4.18-83-g8105f76febd4
Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.18-oe/build/v4.18-83-g8105f76febd4


No regressions (compared to build v4.18)


Ran 15737 total tests in the following environments and test suites.

Environments
--------------
- dragonboard-410c - arm64
- hi6220-hikey - arm64
- juno-r2 - arm64
- qemu_arm
- qemu_arm64
- qemu_x86_64
- x15 - arm
- x86_64

Test Suites
-----------
* boot
* kselftest
* libhugetlbfs
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-timers-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none

-- 
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org