Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263849AbTI2RO0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2003 13:14:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263822AbTI2RNW (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2003 13:13:22 -0400 Received: from dsl-213-023-220-234.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.220.234]:10372 "EHLO server1.intern.kubla.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263819AbTI2RKS convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2003 13:10:18 -0400 From: Dominik Kubla To: =?iso-8859-1?q?J=F6rn=20Engel?= , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] check headers for complete includes, etc. Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 19:10:16 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 References: <20030929145057.GA1002@mars.ravnborg.org> <20030929150005.GA24375@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> In-Reply-To: <20030929150005.GA24375@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200309291910.16733.dominik@kubla.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Montag, 29. September 2003 17:00 schrieb J?rn Engel: > > Would work. But I'd prefer to have that information inside the header > files, under some syntax. > > /* attr: indirect header */ > > Is this acceptable? Just a suggestion: Make it a define. Comments tend to be re-formatted, "improved", deleted, etc. You get the picture. So I think that: #define PRAGMA_INDIRECT_HEADER TRUE (or something similiar) would be better suited. Regards, Dominik -- Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. (Francois Marie Arouet aka Voltaire, 1694-1778) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/