Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp2600350imm; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 12:11:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPwqGB/np0O5H6XIzVW++21IGdmd+SnPzfOMJdgEnssKLa/36PSVvtBle6qvtcsRdocRDalU X-Received: by 2002:a63:5350:: with SMTP id t16-v6mr29756850pgl.196.1534446697883; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 12:11:37 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1534446697; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=yECco13TyV6WpMkj9Cyec9UoffmhH89EaedL9ngchZdgTHKLVQdFXVGb/Som0z9N7m 3QGFUR0aV6WQFXvPinM0+iCLNLNQ18W7FnbaIECcxWDGzvQ1h4p6RrgFnqHE0iet8nYT FfpcVk4wnWmLaVXPVrL0QiYiIKSr3vLHXTrvgtFnz7kXy0OVVblXVdCyT3yphgqnIui5 svKT/Vvcd/4zOxdL9vfphJQAn/h73vYCGl34E4QPeVrhllX9qgaIixHPbCT000zEKNf1 LAsG9k7izlWG6jLZ0dX6EDuZkGnh2hFwUfgdXilM1bchC0Ayw6u9kt12MyGGJbhpvOUc a7pQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=kEBHf+Bb2D0ixiOGGLYnhCwkWUrodpCWHMAq+nCzBFg=; b=gLzGEECg38n7d04dMj9JcXD4Tl+Ig4A/Dm4SX5c4gBnUfcX03os2C/gbLidaUu3VYb ttZ4p/YgYCEJwofXTCDCvjr10TKrJBM2JsTbrCe5FemFahq90jEKtD1tpieizHB4yzf4 Bs/In0SEY37p4mK692X2Q+gq9dCQv0NcdcvHLJaoCDy1UkuFzoTwUSejF0/GQ/+dqcgN mYf/OAi+7KRlCSLPFVaQkj/rjMsz5CZwpFY+0NUzcqQCWlKLuNmMBpuddGFKEVN+Yv6W 0XGl+kvV0p/ubPpb7ocAbjPtTmbS1Zr9fypb4po6X10Xd+GVdY1IvykBQDkSTyrz3Bgi k4Og== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=sDNYbp0A; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 31-v6si87107pli.238.2018.08.16.12.11.23; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 12:11:37 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=sDNYbp0A; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727334AbeHPWKU (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 16 Aug 2018 18:10:20 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f48.google.com ([209.85.214.48]:39683 "EHLO mail-it0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726090AbeHPWKU (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Aug 2018 18:10:20 -0400 Received: by mail-it0-f48.google.com with SMTP id g141-v6so8189008ita.4 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 12:10:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kEBHf+Bb2D0ixiOGGLYnhCwkWUrodpCWHMAq+nCzBFg=; b=sDNYbp0AIPZb2Ep0lQduxHxOZX5jVYT5VxJxxa4U7UcfNPtmhydUpOGWslLYnzonO2 fGiZsyY3HmTUlvbf9Z16q13qEGKS4q4bq+Ioyw6acnuo3J196r0nbHzZPKv+GWH+z8DX 2MTOuPk8xNKBvqEYJqzRT2l0Kb1IFalWfxETTFL1RURf+SwsJk1WBS2vNejvTqpUMI3s own/21LZ7Wt1zbs7sbJ6gSHGkSYuvsdLZxluHxdYFme/El1j/XY11N6y5rFoV5AYfDZC I1ZgI18FGXSSQVDFPUd1L7QNjaV069HudpybYcA3okQUP5vVKAdPbENeCYfL7doq5l4n aDyQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=kEBHf+Bb2D0ixiOGGLYnhCwkWUrodpCWHMAq+nCzBFg=; b=gXAPsRYRfEzF+iKlTZyFkdmivmsqhNNfjNZifoLUQyUorPODtyfRZxvzxleFTL3B+L 1+mnGVEGes4O7FvM+skPvr5l3n6Us/tW25Z0W6z+C2rV6aU4ASW9bL7l+11Mcw7OPKr+ e16CnFxjLoabVJKOzWXFpl6N1Dqjrzqi3r0TTZ71j9fU2C2mzPFU6eW+1tZqdMBXxLep /tE4LgZIfuM3Gj8g3MHCNVi8uh8R17dpW817Mrn7wLxnxsWzGGN2KbEgAxaJQ3RSDokP RA545TbwAy3Y3mvSLdh0zZPU1AGnDE2Ur5XMW1eCWpCn/6y2n6bnFTO7+cCbAygKE2Dt ZtrQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlFjkkphmdVOy+O/oCSUVf+eGfUrV95+MKeDNx5+AoXEExeciSUB AXOKfabCeUS/HN1/N/TtIht5UA== X-Received: by 2002:a02:97a1:: with SMTP id s30-v6mr26774317jaj.89.1534446604526; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 12:10:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.212] (107.191.0.158.static.utbb.net. [107.191.0.158]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d134-v6sm19926iog.84.2018.08.16.12.10.02 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 16 Aug 2018 12:10:03 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH BUGFIX/IMPROVEMENT 0/4] bfq: two fixes and one improvement related to I/O control To: Paolo Valente Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ulf.hansson@linaro.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org, broonie@kernel.org, bfq-iosched@googlegroups.com, oleksandr@natalenko.name References: <20180816165118.17402-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org> From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: <5ac17a9b-1c38-0664-15e3-ff75c9671388@kernel.dk> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 13:10:01 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180816165118.17402-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 8/16/18 10:51 AM, Paolo Valente wrote: > Hi Jens, > > while working a little bit on cgroups I/O control, I found two nasty > bugs in bfq. They break bandwidth control in simple configurations > with one-process groups. These bugs are fixed by the first two patches > in this series. > > These fixes improved I/O control so much, that I could reduce the > write overcharge factor, used by bfq to counter write-induced > issues. This reduction is performed by the third patch. > > The fourth patch contains a little code improvement I made in a > function that has to do with I/O control. > > I hope we are still in time for 4.19. Patches look fine to me. You are in fact several weeks late for 4.19, I need to have anything that's going in to 4.19 by -rc6 or -rc7 time (depending on whether we have an -rc8 or not). This is to ensure that it gets plenty of time in linux-next as well. I've queued up patches this time (since they were small), but please send them in in due time next time. -- Jens Axboe