Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp2615887imm; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 12:29:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPzIxoHCBY442xx7Orzhb1oRQYmoFJMY3ocxpdoqv20FPs94W64Ti7go9bIW+AFsVqjgc1fZ X-Received: by 2002:a63:91c8:: with SMTP id l191-v6mr29517101pge.180.1534447759362; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 12:29:19 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1534447759; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=pxt1Z0B7EWMC6k4LqIBNubqvleuCy0M8JocLMn7EKbKZ/oX/AshjLmL6RnwGPi17Gp aOLccj3DXtz9iSOHPHOYs128lD0Ygmx9PkVtnhtNWEjz6241oR6gXgwBN0SMC9gfELl4 bW0r5KUda5anFeeNdBKpLZD279J2BmK2BivLSz3IUcWhdU+uQsYXcNh0KHp/a2KaVMa+ uMW6hC98qcWgHU7vy+5VODS4YShZyr1kS12LBZyDPv2/U3pkVbQNJI/CIoebxwhuWA0E kv87V+Mm+St8b9CdSkIA9W/s/5bhvBv86qHRu32OXOF/4ALN2ktoev+ZSphVPZ4f8Vdf uiaA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:from:subject:cc:to:message-id:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=34V6wwMw3CoCkpKxXWRnmlNkgd7gaH1anur4P71nhsg=; b=n9WndDN9Mhxsb7Y3Is0x7c38cyLsvUs32GT3BwmaNfA9qTCsOE+tE9FFJCnKmzlJW1 /9JKZ+n41ul3T3/fzod6HiqzBt5SjbLZKvglieqETzjJexA5Rd27Y8hGJQNkP/zr88Mm TvASjU25RuhG1qHCTEBUypdutP8T98SeMVIMon+zpg4/60YQxX2NF3gccLGPS55XAQSS kupnfnvK6l5OuT4Nmjcfij8YImaG5Ju7xSUsSULVxugS+MAEjLpjsBgGVr6kXMYiAG0V EHp70C+jJxG7IbstB7v/QRuRBrwUGvt8kVrlayufsAlbaL6My1RDUx9fCMxEhCwsjb86 xFVQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g26-v6si112914pgb.349.2018.08.16.12.29.03; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 12:29:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726199AbeHPW14 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 16 Aug 2018 18:27:56 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.9]:60824 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725783AbeHPW14 (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Aug 2018 18:27:56 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [205.153.50.125]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: davem-davemloft) by shards.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AA4C3145E668B; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 12:27:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 12:27:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20180816.122736.1276296581513153374.davem@davemloft.net> To: ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org Cc: grygorii.strashko@ti.com, corbet@lwn.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] Documentation: networking: ti-cpsw: correct cbs parameters for Eth1 100Mb From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20180815202953.10137-1-ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org> References: <20180815202953.10137-1-ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 26 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Thu, 16 Aug 2018 12:27:36 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Ivan Khoronzhuk Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 23:29:53 +0300 > If set cbs parameters calculated for 1000Mb, but use on 100Mb port > w/o h/w offload (for cpsw offload it doesn't matter), it works > incorrectly. According to the example and testing board, second port > is 100Mb interface. Correct them on recalculated for 100Mb interface. > It allows to use the same command for CBS software implementation for > board in example. > > Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk Applied, thanks.