Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp2624773imm; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 12:39:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPyD9PRNxpTWk4iK493FaS6d8C5IGpFBObZ3QNeGnHCT7Q/L+li+aTsM6mH+fWYaQbGQzYnT X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8a8e:: with SMTP id p14-v6mr30076162plo.213.1534448362476; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 12:39:22 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1534448362; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=H2SbWeZaWbzrqrmKc1jE93FhtT3xjHs9GmwppEds5xuFsi1LiBHaesA8HOsHu/29IF Edrzf6C1FDMvRE1qXuiZi4p1GZ+PJtUGCdBNV2uff4jaMLefAqknCEtQ+slVFIHfj9gb h9NhJ1yXipOs7n+E8RNmJCoUZdreY0nHfDCnKrzNFRZRd4PQEih/PWESXwcX+h7Ql9nz cDOZG/7ugSWJMm+GKrM6oQW8zMd5uVMCyMk+mu/BtCnpgaR1E6WsueFQg0O4adi+f+Ey kYx/c9Uevv917Kwfa58ebR29+9tLkvB0fvR/mdHDyi5xvYOptw3nexzBnigGYm6PqGGH ZHYA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=EOomyM8+CFscMDL/FtVrbfedSmCw2XhfclDbxVuU84k=; b=LXG9+IKzJ8+wtRiwVVb6X353xOD3vAki+G9EEk/1kU8W3haANSMIpqsr9jawnjwddV Wto+G9j7uEYZ8LmcCCu+62gwXvTb96tUMFFWIoQmbduQ9b9deSyhVJ1XL57L9+RlQtwD Pp8Gw25qBeLJQyeoEBSNWxYgm13i0qLS2CrqaeuxjaRumqf3KcOfuOMc/tjDyKmJeoLn nF0CYVIPwYL+eeSNJmUWXM1x3UHTCEXYRtyutKzJCbtoOM1y/crGP4oNEuiaNJ/5x2L5 pwOlPTpEb4VPpty8ikFdLnGHKLXIjiFMgztv74WN+0LGJ/JNe1m2j5RSRcf4O35ZWnFf qjHg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=QSGuiHyR; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 194-v6si35875pfz.101.2018.08.16.12.39.04; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 12:39:22 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=QSGuiHyR; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726011AbeHPWiD (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 16 Aug 2018 18:38:03 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f66.google.com ([74.125.82.66]:53639 "EHLO mail-wm0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725782AbeHPWiC (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Aug 2018 18:38:02 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f66.google.com with SMTP id s9-v6so5498956wmh.3; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 12:37:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EOomyM8+CFscMDL/FtVrbfedSmCw2XhfclDbxVuU84k=; b=QSGuiHyRrbqDBtLPWME1dtWTHCYv928M8yDYKc4rZx0M4hYCkkCJSvG/4BPrRNLQGy V0QGya1NF97HrAf+1XW/H1lfmdln0+par1RugYT3djyIo3aYLq6kIoWfpssePUJedDYW MR8847GjigzkdTTE7sBX0RiCPD94Q7N96dYJIiJHBX5OcT56abirMLDUjbEhOrwqpFbY usZFGkCbdey92IeT6FfcZuEPAQW2vcSKStkOgAcRKJBCv0YzNlkcksXdlOfPwN3dIdEP IAzJHy1wUEqsCZ6A+bzMfmk6w0t7XKP30kV0Uq1xogzcec03830KmOIrdgIH+h1hGrR/ epOA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=EOomyM8+CFscMDL/FtVrbfedSmCw2XhfclDbxVuU84k=; b=HQgGPAMOB/sUUWKssBzQRrBkgmNaJZDxg7JNyRRRiigmvOb31Gn4rpCZ2F2msX2c++ RTmxNSS0iUBxeXiHU7uX6GCA1d8fMohQNnxiQrtDPFFEp84aSwGsTUz8fPCPWfZyqcv/ sZj6/P80C6vYVW6DpzP9K7lvrAJpY8iORRbhu3J4yoGEvjav+VNG0DtRaNj+fV9vCfyj y1jne32WVYIvQWATtdW2DHi38cjGsMlKbSqhSOAKxMBloKFn6TVBefzdBHwTkmOTF7wS TUxLy93mzq8eidawkyL8/7BeAwjXzKgMMF0HuYVuwCCTRmGgeXii5UNdas7dnhIpoYwN 59Xg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlFyCz5qLI/WnXgAieonpy41MolX7E1wW0eHLsCNDAMcsPHG4GBh W7/b6bWVUDk/TOtT48nELZVydq32 X-Received: by 2002:a1c:b213:: with SMTP id b19-v6mr16146489wmf.141.1534448259305; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 12:37:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2003:ea:8bd4:d600:fce9:ceca:5c9:a793? (p200300EA8BD4D600FCE9CECA05C9A793.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:ea:8bd4:d600:fce9:ceca:5c9:a793]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id r140-v6sm4213270wmd.7.2018.08.16.12.37.38 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 16 Aug 2018 12:37:38 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] r8169: don't use MSI-X on RTL8106e To: David Miller , jian-hong@endlessm.com Cc: nic_swsd@realtek.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux@endlessm.com References: <20180815062110.16155-1-jian-hong@endlessm.com> <20180816.122131.604270853620318143.davem@davemloft.net> From: Heiner Kallweit Message-ID: <458efbf9-5971-653a-e7cd-8c56ba055648@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 21:37:31 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180816.122131.604270853620318143.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 16.08.2018 21:21, David Miller wrote: > From: > Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 14:21:10 +0800 > >> Found the ethernet network on ASUS X441UAR doesn't come back on resume >> from suspend when using MSI-X. The chip is RTL8106e - version 39. > > Heiner, please take a look at this. > > You recently disabled MSI-X on RTL8168g for similar reasons. > > Now that we've seen two chips like this, maybe there is some other > problem afoot. > Thanks for the hint. I saw it already and just contacted Realtek whether they are aware of any MSI-X issues with particular chip versions. With the chip versions I have access to MSI-X works fine. There's also the theoretical option that the issues are caused by broken BIOS's. But so far only chip versions have been reported which are very similar, at least with regard to version number (2x VER_40, 1x VER_39). So they may share some buggy component. Let's see whether Realtek can provide some hint. If more chip versions are reported having problems with MSI-X, then we could switch to a whitelist or disable MSI-X in general. Heiner > Thanks. >