Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp2659167imm; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 13:19:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPw+9FGrpuWd0lf2VNmYsBk9NoTvxTJzqHdcUh5E6aFe/PxpeYpc/I9cuCfNubuylSqaZkI1 X-Received: by 2002:a62:5ec3:: with SMTP id s186-v6mr28293804pfb.146.1534450777409; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 13:19:37 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1534450777; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=t+OrX+1ENcUJtQ9ikhjc5+U0HTAy2duua85XlIsY3W9GNkOUMJ+CLm+j973RJZzeXc 3gE92iCGDPJYf+1WMIWbLTBgybKqi6eiB2IeEIEC9w1Y33eV0g3XxNoQTR0UdFAJC42C xtI1sF9FOnJaDcAp1oktcDQiZo/ww6xExYddvDuaN6/SDszkD14VHWpk1aS/wf0SC5V4 s7ArFZJr9pEoIRVMVtA74qCE5hvmUQV+HNHwiQeTDJM8K3F+5kiN3XN/Fgy3SlxOYid2 qXH5OY57T8r/BWiDTTVbQa1HHnFg+451qvzEPOZ8eTncbEv1bnq3L5b3atxATuNYT/6D J0cQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:references :in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :arc-authentication-results; bh=6DWSX8YmI8xdrW3LC1qRSWUllaSL9fRosPCfamQDzBU=; b=MIUrc05Z5RALBWWXEqjiY4/5mlBg1aFOhXQB7OuXcZfNNr83GWgotnivKs0szyYwF8 IJmh5Y1Usa5zERqwYPq/ZFoIJM5vMVhUqHbKGaMkaRZR3UplGf2cbgbC52vzQbMF0eFn Ud+jM2N2XAhZbVCZ56b5mnhoAtnj8RioGGGAhJw3IkFYFJ0IkJHDFZCeLIpExEV56IaY MgLId/0YPdKljtwIPoxYgvXCEEyp6+xtMMIUaNBhdPCX0AS7XVukN53uwFKXl8dl2tBY WwvSDS1MMbDc+/0G5M+5+tzrP1IO3K3/bLIU32tSXkfZjMmCK8uTa0Cg+xT9y21mtpqZ RGGg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u136-v6si188757pgc.453.2018.08.16.13.19.22; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 13:19:37 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726306AbeHPXRZ (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 16 Aug 2018 19:17:25 -0400 Received: from mga17.intel.com ([192.55.52.151]:43390 "EHLO mga17.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725899AbeHPXRE (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Aug 2018 19:17:04 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Aug 2018 13:16:34 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.53,248,1531810800"; d="scan'208";a="225248277" Received: from rchatre-s.jf.intel.com ([10.54.70.76]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Aug 2018 13:16:33 -0700 From: Reinette Chatre To: tglx@linutronix.de, fenghua.yu@intel.com, tony.luck@intel.com, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org, vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com Cc: gavin.hindman@intel.com, jithu.joseph@intel.com, dave.hansen@intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Reinette Chatre Subject: [PATCH V2 1/6] perf/core: Add sanity check to deal with pinned event failure Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 13:16:04 -0700 Message-Id: <6a54e5c43aca477db9957e083024701bd199b7ab.1534450299.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.0 In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org It is possible that a failure can occur during the scheduling of a pinned event. The initial portion of perf_event_read_local() contains the various error checks an event should pass before it can be considered valid. Ensure that the potential scheduling failure of a pinned event is checked for and have a credible error. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180807093615.GY2494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre --- kernel/events/core.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c index 80cca2b30c4f..005d0f2519fd 100644 --- a/kernel/events/core.c +++ b/kernel/events/core.c @@ -3940,6 +3940,12 @@ int perf_event_read_local(struct perf_event *event, u64 *value, goto out; } + /* If this is a pinned event it must be running on this CPU */ + if (event->attr.pinned && event->oncpu != smp_processor_id()) { + ret = -EBUSY; + goto out; + } + /* * If the event is currently on this CPU, its either a per-task event, * or local to this CPU. Furthermore it means its ACTIVE (otherwise -- 2.17.0