Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264193AbTI2UPb (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2003 16:15:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264196AbTI2UPb (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2003 16:15:31 -0400 Received: from tmr-02.dsl.thebiz.net ([216.238.38.204]:34321 "EHLO gatekeeper.tmr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264193AbTI2UPa (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2003 16:15:30 -0400 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Path: gatekeeper.tmr.com!davidsen From: davidsen@tmr.com (bill davidsen) Newsgroups: mail.linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PROBLEM] [2.6.0-test6] Stale NFS file handle Date: 29 Sep 2003 20:06:03 GMT Organization: TMR Associates, Schenectady NY Lines: 14 Message-ID: References: <200309282031.54043.MalteSch@gmx.de> <20030928184841.GL532@neon> X-Trace: gatekeeper.tmr.com 1064865963 3746 192.168.12.62 (29 Sep 2003 20:06:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@tmr.com Originator: davidsen@gatekeeper.tmr.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In article <20030928184841.GL532@neon>, Axel Siebenwirth wrote: | Are you using mount options when mounting the NFS volume? | I had this problem when I used rsize=8192 and wsize=8192 as nfs mount | options. Just left them out and everything was fine again. This is useful as a test and problem identification, but if you're transferring significant data between systems other than those directly connected with a low latency connection you do see performance loss. -- bill davidsen CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/