Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264745AbTI2UfM (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2003 16:35:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264746AbTI2UfM (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2003 16:35:12 -0400 Received: from fed1mtao06.cox.net ([68.6.19.125]:7091 "EHLO fed1mtao06.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264745AbTI2UfG (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2003 16:35:06 -0400 Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 13:34:51 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: Judith Lebzelter Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, plm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: PowerPC Cross-compile of 2.6 kernels Message-ID: <20030929203451.GB7563@ip68-0-152-218.tc.ph.cox.net> References: <20030929165408.GA4102@ip68-0-152-218.tc.ph.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 01:21:53PM -0700, Judith Lebzelter wrote: > On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > As of 2.6.0-test6, allyesconfig (with no fiddling of other options) > > on PPC is as sane as it's going to be. :) > > > > Does this mean that the results of the compile are not useful or even > confusing, since they do not fuss with configuration options? Would it be > better not to run the 'allyesconfig' option? Well, on PPC we get CONFIG_ISA, which is useful for a few drivers, but I suspect that it will enable a number of 'other' drivers as well. I'm not sure what would be more useful however. -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/