Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp768847imm; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 06:25:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPwrwNGp3DwiQYzERwafZ6tMR67WnnMhKqQumBtd9e1xkMKsIiXMmnXxb0vpRg3SVfGoJMxW X-Received: by 2002:a63:7c43:: with SMTP id l3-v6mr1918154pgn.311.1534512329749; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 06:25:29 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1534512329; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ccsmZdOlFmtey4IL2pq/GO79KucFwarGUURqZhIPt0fp2gMRtjlFvYRhtCnJ1FX0CI qpOCI4Zl62tsHJUvlTfDPm8ovHp1ZTiNS3bD7SI09RseIwwpsX5cdiL/WAQLggOY/bNi w0uB/LlHd45PLwGqp6LeXnbngIUTXt+bL7vf761WIYwJVuDZxs27cdU5wWOW5R3sebUF Xngnd1bs8MirvBkA+w3Tk4v4KNVseJbL+A8pPqJuSOHFxSOvGEtZ01+s7Ql1zfr/okak 70zXAYBJoAV/RGeTaer7mVqur8/14yLgQhc/DAl3GVRvygqOC/zd8GcRBOzJMiJzdBL+ G9lQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :from:references:cc:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=G0ARa+VBc0HdoGk1ZdDd/TirUy4jjJiE5ZwOSOArTmU=; b=VWSFSREH8ROP6dojOAziXcezJUsGxoN4wsc2FEGTm4rIVRwM+BD7tYPJ1Nu7nxqo0z cD0GCAyUvYWRhBiUbqZy0BNNutTKZSfLnsMQQH9UWKEIbKwxymPwJeRxzteEwt49RYzP JtffJF+7NuAd9norbuIqXooL+QdZjJCM84XUpjp1FmKbqtox+wey1VCgbkmfJp2zT7J6 mMuh2njmyA3b81CwUpIFvuz/GwmfFt8mROUTnJISIuii1VLNLtCK/gauIpuvYTmcBVFW xWa7jbyw+dxGZEyTFFwOKPjRP3r9wkXehNvqdpUcwkUcF4NoIP0eBXphfhPM9C4WzAhc zJ6A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z5-v6si2227785plo.130.2018.08.17.06.25.14; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 06:25:29 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727434AbeHQQ1P (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 17 Aug 2018 12:27:15 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:58226 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726495AbeHQQ1P (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Aug 2018 12:27:15 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098394.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w7HDNph9100318 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 09:23:52 -0400 Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com (e34.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.152]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2kwvb5xxaw-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 09:23:51 -0400 Received: from localhost by e34.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 07:23:37 -0600 Received: from b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (9.17.130.15) by e34.co.us.ibm.com (192.168.1.134) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Fri, 17 Aug 2018 07:23:33 -0600 Received: from b03ledav002.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav002.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.233]) by b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w7HDNVc966846972 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 17 Aug 2018 06:23:31 -0700 Received: from b03ledav002.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4C3B136051; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 07:23:30 -0600 (MDT) Received: from b03ledav002.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE3DB136053; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 07:23:26 -0600 (MDT) Received: from oc8043147753.ibm.com (unknown [9.80.206.50]) by b03ledav002.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 07:23:26 -0600 (MDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 10/22] s390: vfio-ap: sysfs interfaces to configure adapters To: Cornelia Huck Cc: Tony Krowiak , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, freude@de.ibm.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, kwankhede@nvidia.com, bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com, alifm@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com, jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com, pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com, berrange@redhat.com, fiuczy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, buendgen@de.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com References: <1534196899-16987-1-git-send-email-akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1534196899-16987-11-git-send-email-akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180815115242.35a2a1ce.cohuck@redhat.com> <4bf27c7a-34c6-9160-cdc6-19022b86202b@linux.ibm.com> <20180816093015.19e54936.cohuck@redhat.com> From: Tony Krowiak Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 09:23:26 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180816093015.19e54936.cohuck@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18081713-0016-0000-0000-0000091C3371 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00009561; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000266; SDB=6.01074832; UDB=6.00553932; IPR=6.00854790; MB=3.00022773; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2018-08-17 13:23:36 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18081713-0017-0000-0000-00004007D348 Message-Id: <6e933696-515c-0533-796b-ef75b8627c84@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-08-17_03:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=896 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1807170000 definitions=main-1808170147 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08/16/2018 03:30 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Wed, 15 Aug 2018 12:59:35 -0400 > Tony Krowiak wrote: > >> On 08/15/2018 05:52 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote: >>> On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 17:48:07 -0400 >>> Tony Krowiak wrote: >>>> +/** >>>> + * unassign_adapter_store >>>> + * >>>> + * @dev: the matrix device >>>> + * @attr: a mediated matrix device attribute >>>> + * @buf: a buffer containing the adapter ID (APID) to be assigned >>>> + * @count: the number of bytes in @buf >>>> + * >>>> + * Parses the APID from @buf and unassigns it from the mediated matrix device. >>>> + * The APID must be a valid value >>> A valid value, but not necessarily assigned, right? >> You are correct, if the APID is not assigned, then the corresponding bit >> will be >> cleared regardless. In a previous version, the functions failed if the >> APID is >> not assigned, but a colleague removed that check. I guess it makes sense >> given >> it really does not hurt anything to ask to unassign an APID that isn't >> assigned >> to begin with. Would you prefer I update the comment, or do you feel the >> user >> should be made aware of an attempt to unassign an APID that is not assigned? > I think the code is fine; updating the comment would be good. Will do. >