Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 17 Aug 2018 16:05:34 -0500
From:   Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com>
To:     Pawel Laszczak <pawell@cadence.com>
CC:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>, Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <ltyrala@cadence.com>,
        <adouglas@cadence.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/31] Introduced new Cadence USBSSP DRD Driver
Message-ID: <20180817210534.GA11144@uda0271908>
Mail-Followup-To: Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com>,
        Pawel Laszczak <pawell@cadence.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ltyrala@cadence.com,
        adouglas@cadence.com
References: <1532023084-28083-1-git-send-email-pawell@cadence.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1532023084-28083-1-git-send-email-pawell@cadence.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 06:57:33PM +0100, Pawel Laszczak wrote:
> This patch set introduce new Cadence USBSSP DRD driver
> to linux kernel.

Does the driver have to use 'usbssp' as the controller prefix? Is 'ssp'
acceptable? It would make the tons of variable names shorter and the
code much cleaner to read.

Regards,
-Bin.