Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp1560854imm; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 23:01:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPy2HXy9ZhEjT4Xp11t3QSEWtlrx9SS3WRm1qklNtcL/7+lwZS4DPoyv8qk4SHIy1qn0XjKp X-Received: by 2002:a65:6086:: with SMTP id t6-v6mr10628002pgu.424.1534572060508; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 23:01:00 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1534572060; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=jy0CwmYZ1dPdGQU5pT6+hfI7yshYvaqGF8wTXXJyIpNcY9YTceUMBw+6GmVadGoaKV EMVljQWD/rOMBottCBYExRy7lM4eSpHqpfKxzeOBuIQKcfXj5M276URb2nZi/raJQFSA j4OlfGrzapFg2e9OEVMDG0W81z69J/u1kgI0sCUDr3o6CaxQTquvRiO7EFBv1Lu33hhb GIK2WRyTa+HDttFDznxvVdw2g1xdf6cAQGFhLjbefULlI4GnXAUIxSzNUVpAHhmJmvCw Wer2MHNWcXeCIrqzezfcSCpKK890HN4CeVwSBqjLzXYx/onBBx4yuss4q78KrkMeleAL rXSA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :references:subject:cc:to:mime-version:user-agent:from:date :message-id:arc-authentication-results; bh=7aQT2KTedCTfnOlMllxcOUZa9qTuIYqBDSOBcVb7kxI=; b=uO/q5BVo+IbKqWzyISt+CZBB4WKjyNCF3OzxAgiMIhOnW4SGfp8MWuDdGjXdyvhBKR wD8ms90Mi+tBMwJ5oQaHIYU7jiy8UtI94a7x7KuD7bLPQsoJ/dS0j1iBWSOtp+a6qA7l buRRESnUcNlFOGdpe7ESaHk7iNhzyHO1oKzJfJsauEERhhFzmHf+P7VgKv39ftqXhMDV +cTDMKPHnWGmjA5CVywfdxRwsIbwR8NNbe/V/+ZFoX6VWiulSJoG3s3bUSzqI9oM1ozv oMeXkcfvROWFvWBzltmwNVFXUFqwfLwSbMpB3pvFA1oxurxpWq4+nXxpVNCWbANGf8m3 J+JQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j17-v6si4059565pfk.203.2018.08.17.23.00.44; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 23:01:00 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726354AbeHRJGF (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 18 Aug 2018 05:06:05 -0400 Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.32]:45014 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726071AbeHRJGF (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Aug 2018 05:06:05 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS405-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 25426EF516E2C; Sat, 18 Aug 2018 13:59:35 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.177.29.68) by DGGEMS405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.205) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.399.0; Sat, 18 Aug 2018 13:59:34 +0800 Message-ID: <5B77B5C3.8060908@huawei.com> Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2018 13:59:31 +0800 From: zhong jiang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vladimir Zapolskiy CC: , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ethernet: lpc_eth: Use NULL to compare with pointer-typed value rather than 0 References: <1534511933-39236-1-git-send-email-zhongjiang@huawei.com> <1534511933-39236-3-git-send-email-zhongjiang@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.177.29.68] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2018/8/17 23:29, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote: > Hi zhong jiang, > > On 08/17/2018 04:18 PM, zhong jiang wrote: >> We should use NULL to compare with pointer-typed value rather than 0. >> The issue is detected with the help of Coccinelle. >> --- >> drivers/net/ethernet/nxp/lpc_eth.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/nxp/lpc_eth.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/nxp/lpc_eth.c >> index 08381ef..04d9e62 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/nxp/lpc_eth.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/nxp/lpc_eth.c >> @@ -1350,7 +1350,7 @@ static int lpc_eth_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> "IRAM not big enough for net buffers, using SDRAM instead.\n"); >> } >> >> - if (pldat->dma_buff_base_v == 0) { >> + if (pldat->dma_buff_base_v == NULL) { > That's a valid finding, but please use a common 0 and NULL comparison in form of > > if (!pldat->dma_buff_base_v) > > To the change above please feel free to add my > > Acked-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy Thanks, Will do in v2 >> ret = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32)); >> if (ret) >> goto err_out_free_irq; >> > > . >