Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp1910213imm; Sat, 18 Aug 2018 07:02:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPz8zXDVTCy+rEPqcTBPMuUlYIzqVF7ya772NeK2yv3FHvzcLzntWMEqFERsjSOWvqXguTLB X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7798:: with SMTP id o24-v6mr38544259pll.186.1534600948591; Sat, 18 Aug 2018 07:02:28 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1534600948; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=akCm08wwNMhM/hVvaxl3L/sKQJoikUyWzN143vXCSXaHHokpztV8KazX3cUBMuKC5a GELOS/LbksVGRrmYqnRMRqHGAjaHMB88jD0e5LD5k1ar89g7AcJzhxfNhkFg2nm9l7Jk t7uOQ9ggmvsXEzKtQNYq8OZIYbpFb2RxLIX9KpcyRzEb5N7rqkwbJDIEOG1x1+IFV04v kXiRJZlcdwnipb7VI/cWI30iVBGNHvT/wbl9+OXvJIlbwy+oD44mlfqQ//VAGz6iDGRC flmuV2lOHC4qDIJKdcZUV8Nhl6v7NXmbUSoYse5Pxmcd/dy60LLR4N8C27dq+dPRmEW4 zIig== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=rEqkppDk9EkmtI1O+zGbW6TQa6sMA1azT3r4qraua44=; b=BdLJQbHyLANEOUiEpplesOejujLVcD7JNvqGeP9AFphjYfonHO9VZlfThV8iG8zoaG pA8niwJNy4cTRL4B7rztXiQ33/C10cf8JIvslYwCJj/J4krZiC8lGVQmCD9LI/C+2iiI JqqIcEzQYWxHs8YqWIoAntCMUXWiuDr4Yy+Z6Ogo4zb3DY29qJeZb2FJDX3+/ibDMDTO K7VD9kXVVOTgwfo07AzbOpma3mRWctHBokbnQ9QaU4tvJRstuDXoV0tsqg5tVqS/YW3q VFFiZJJS9CgGCA4rSgv1C9idOOjtSjeADYsdU2Mnfz5jgde9uT/yOaucsNssHtJDTjrl eEpA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w71-v6si4283666pgd.667.2018.08.18.07.02.12; Sat, 18 Aug 2018 07:02:28 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726299AbeHRRIz (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 18 Aug 2018 13:08:55 -0400 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.104]:7459 "EHLO mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726189AbeHRRIz (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Aug 2018 13:08:55 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.53,256,1531778400"; d="scan'208";a="276167689" Received: from abo-214-111-68.mrs.modulonet.fr (HELO hadrien) ([85.68.111.214]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Aug 2018 16:01:04 +0200 Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2018 16:01:04 +0200 (CEST) From: Julia Lawall X-X-Sender: jll@hadrien To: zhong jiang cc: Himanshu Jha , Gilles Muller , nicolas.palix@imag.fr, michal.lkml@markovi.net, yamada.masahiro@socionext.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Coccinelle: remove pci_alloc_consistent semantic to dectect in zalloc-simple.cocci In-Reply-To: <5B782572.5000802@huawei.com> Message-ID: References: <1534593700-3036-1-git-send-email-zhongjiang@huawei.com> <20180818125228.GA1000@himanshu-Vostro-3559> <5B782572.5000802@huawei.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 18 Aug 2018, zhong jiang wrote: > On 2018/8/18 20:52, Himanshu Jha wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 08:01:40PM +0800, zhong jiang wrote: > >> Because pci_alloc_consistent has been deprecated. We prefer to use > >> dam_alloc_coherent directly. Therefore, we should remove pci_alloc_consistent > > ^^^ typo "dma" > > > > Also, typo in the patch subject "dectect" -> "detect" > Thanks, will fix it in v2. > > Otherwise, > > > > Acked-by: Himanshu Jha > > > > Thanks for cleaning up, we still have few more *_alloc/memset > > in the mainline, especially in the scsi subsystem, even after > > I cleaned up with two long patch series in the past. > > > I post same patches like *_alloc/memset in the scsi subsystem. Unfortunately, > Maintainer maybe do not care about the change. therefore, None of my patches > are received and rarely feedback. Maybe they will be picked up later. julia