Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp1954259imm; Sat, 18 Aug 2018 07:54:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPzu6gy8HR3KkDMo8Wn5TvCKjBC1b7Gs0Qd5+laH2yyYGzDU+ky8o1GTkaEMrY4JzAIK6MrI X-Received: by 2002:a63:6446:: with SMTP id y67-v6mr2139661pgb.443.1534604059492; Sat, 18 Aug 2018 07:54:19 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1534604059; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=lfAfw4yjB1G1KOWRHt1DxwG/Sjdc9DVDxakxuiUASGgCucnQcnb9eN660oinFRFHFE 7BqNkhhtxuu/VrN43A+bA3reqqUTLGHbj1NT/E/GFXtUpDpPE/kLtERDNRQdRh7yAkKj GrdvyVBX94zLtIzLri844kUjwR7y+2+qp2vgJdtyCT78WMtJtgY7FwcelJkpH04ui/6G vsneMxm37TZVyGCES/J4SUJClAEDLN2P9juqrHs2M4wVIOat/Ue5D3Sts91zM30+q4ws a8g9LBBVOEN02PE2HMQ+pMa/nAt0r3vpDkjRinCcqlZbPFR6NfoHygtCoGUS956w5XEs rohw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature:arc-authentication-results; bh=k3N2hZuX3kb2ZpOrsF/ZfcGwtydDC3DriHqwSTWYPd0=; b=vCX4wUFs6gccXlmMjppPeaeXFtHLxfYgZfIWeI+izVLvapr9gL61fSu308VS0TZWeO gJ6cBv9KPRwrbHTmHl81gniAmPpTHZLhC0D8Ga0C5xyhoQw5q/rat+VrqT7CmXro2rcb eyWhM/DoxxidimJraqI8UjA4wRZkAMNRtbypL97B1uK02/EQVc17LdfTs3kpK3Vi9bIG E8agOt44hFKOpW+G9iAwM4eKI91DLfqVBlpUM42XNb1B0qxhTdjEFS8jfTWntxWEWFlU yR9grK1XJ3YCNYBhMDk+Ng36vX1ubBvbUspekMjKoHWr22TTogQQNQXljosOL9nRh3u9 ph6Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=XJ5qmgmz; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f90-v6si4897333plf.30.2018.08.18.07.54.02; Sat, 18 Aug 2018 07:54:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=XJ5qmgmz; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726334AbeHRSAu (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 18 Aug 2018 14:00:50 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f193.google.com ([209.85.215.193]:40454 "EHLO mail-pg1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726088AbeHRSAt (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Aug 2018 14:00:49 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f193.google.com with SMTP id z25-v6so117332pgu.7 for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2018 07:52:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=k3N2hZuX3kb2ZpOrsF/ZfcGwtydDC3DriHqwSTWYPd0=; b=XJ5qmgmzbTO0+YMBULn+4tfiG4SwbiP+gvrNDd3s2Bdc9qo0cP6Mu/2wVZIG16iLQj rlhRT+yhAN9kV7p+BcC/oxQ92C3adT4B0VLcKosJ4GXURnNW8TWfWPOAQ57cMJeEXyUV CGJ1PrS23QsQfbLSAGJprO/gpp2R0kY+RKaeHWT81V7ECRABfvNE3P4V4GLg9dAfF+9w 6G7c8Kp3ODJvEsygD0odW0pPiGivaCjMEjB49SQdojWh41apFumiHebVi5QZi8oWbbWP z6aT7RIMvslPIWJfEbdsCm0NnPRC5UR54mkSvX7LTy1U5XBilPbiHOMerPwpWe19eTqf 5g+w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=k3N2hZuX3kb2ZpOrsF/ZfcGwtydDC3DriHqwSTWYPd0=; b=HlWtv9ylUTFHYUZFoloeIj0kUvNRx5Y9cmP/GlHBr08G/jMlZACa2kUv62lguMyC7v bXhI1ZwJo+Z8Mss6XCt1QBShPJemuko2/+U+YdcA/dh09Bl7naCDnlaln5QT/aaCQNL6 EMoDDk+PK+T8mdJy6OnYOnCdE0q+wBoPNXf/fy93LfZ9VgnZuDKMJMaFhQhkyTSc/u+t C1xyXIAOS57tVWlc761wjoQ6NbepJB30lhQ5OmTlOJkGX/W1/fsC22v1R9oWQTMzYFi6 2pNSYo4V7or61y0BJSBv6NaC1Ct3qV3u7TYuoDPD7n+e1nvnR8bYWQVzJPJmtfYHzOd3 W/uQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlHvuCDul63iKhYsk77jzdHyQK2efqHmcjfdDF9PQTMZa1+EcogW ioDc7NxHh9K4wMZx3uXdR2k= X-Received: by 2002:a63:fb57:: with SMTP id w23-v6mr36824292pgj.441.1534603971633; Sat, 18 Aug 2018 07:52:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from himanshu-Vostro-3559 ([103.233.116.134]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q26-v6sm5915562pff.9.2018.08.18.07.52.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 18 Aug 2018 07:52:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2018 20:22:43 +0530 From: Himanshu Jha To: zhong jiang Cc: Julia Lawall , Gilles Muller , nicolas.palix@imag.fr, michal.lkml@markovi.net, yamada.masahiro@socionext.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Coccinelle: remove pci_alloc_consistent semantic to dectect in zalloc-simple.cocci Message-ID: <20180818145243.GA2150@himanshu-Vostro-3559> References: <1534593700-3036-1-git-send-email-zhongjiang@huawei.com> <20180818125228.GA1000@himanshu-Vostro-3559> <5B782572.5000802@huawei.com> <5B7828D2.5010506@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5B7828D2.5010506@huawei.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 10:10:26PM +0800, zhong jiang wrote: > On 2018/8/18 22:01, Julia Lawall wrote: > > > > On Sat, 18 Aug 2018, zhong jiang wrote: > > > >> On 2018/8/18 20:52, Himanshu Jha wrote: > >>> On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 08:01:40PM +0800, zhong jiang wrote: > >>>> Because pci_alloc_consistent has been deprecated. We prefer to use > >>>> dam_alloc_coherent directly. Therefore, we should remove pci_alloc_consistent > >>> ^^^ typo "dma" > >>> > >>> Also, typo in the patch subject "dectect" -> "detect" > >> Thanks, will fix it in v2. > >>> Otherwise, > >>> > >>> Acked-by: Himanshu Jha > >>> > >>> Thanks for cleaning up, we still have few more *_alloc/memset > >>> in the mainline, especially in the scsi subsystem, even after > >>> I cleaned up with two long patch series in the past. > >>> > >> I post same patches like *_alloc/memset in the scsi subsystem. Unfortunately, > >> Maintainer maybe do not care about the change. therefore, None of my patches > >> are received and rarely feedback. > > Maybe they will be picked up later. > Hope so. It's been more than a month since I post the patches. Maybe I should give a kindly ping. :-) Heh! The problem is Martin only when picks up patches if the driver maintainer Acks them, and it happens very rarely until you have a *real* bugfix. But since these patches are simple, so Martin should pick it up even if the patch doesn't receive any feedback. If you ping, then certainly Martin will give you the same feedback. Maybe you can make them happy by sending a syzbot bugfix ;) -- Himanshu Jha Undergraduate Student Department of Electronics & Communication Guru Tegh Bahadur Institute of Technology