Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263075AbTI3BSE (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2003 21:18:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263081AbTI3BSE (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2003 21:18:04 -0400 Received: from dyn-ctb-210-9-243-176.webone.com.au ([210.9.243.176]:30468 "EHLO chimp.local.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263075AbTI3BSB (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2003 21:18:01 -0400 Message-ID: <3F78D9A3.1070906@cyberone.com.au> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 11:17:23 +1000 From: Nick Piggin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030827 Debian/1.4-3 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Anthony CC: linux-kernel Subject: Re: Possible regression with 2.6.0-test6 References: <200309290822.09859.stephena@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: <200309290822.09859.stephena@users.sourceforge.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Stephen Anthony wrote: >I've noticed that test6 isn't as 'smooth' as test5. Specifically, if I >open an nedit window and use the cursor down key to scroll down through >text, there is some jerkiness. At this point I've noticed that CPU use >goes to 1% or more. A similar problem happens with Opera (web browser), >but of course the CPU usage is higher, which is expected. > >When I go back to test5, scrolling in nedit is smoother, and CPU never >goes above 0.6%. Note that the speed that text moves is the same in >both, but the test6 version 'jumps' and 'stops' for a little bit. Hence >my describing it as jerky. > >I know its not much to go on, but it is a noticable difference, at least >to me. Since this new release has tweaked interactivity patches, I'm >wondering if this has anything to do with it. > >System is a fully updated Mandrake 9.1, but I don't think that would >matter. CPU is P4-2.4GHz with 768 MB RAM, and NVidia video card. > Hi Stephen, the new CPU scheduler is likely to be the change. You need to first make sure your X server is not reniced to -10 (should be at 0). If that fails to help, then you could try my scheduler (with X at -10!) http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/v15a/sched-rollup-v15a-260t6.gz - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/