Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp3672198imm; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 02:46:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPz8FgQNqpovQ3VWBF5D1Mc2ZZ58f8MmE0gwOgRX8AQ5rAaJbh4tBpm9+iAJG26bqDkSvcmf X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:850c:: with SMTP id bj12-v6mr3435586plb.330.1534758409360; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 02:46:49 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1534758409; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=SEGbo34CcUpXCct93goz4/d4N51pWZjTF8B8y7kItWMdW+9+zTuNC9u0Gzkxz+f9zz 89jtAVM/V47m5sJaTdtgwvqFyzpqVC+CZ60RXdFpUXzvoZaoNDM1wo760xqz72pifisn UqnCNeVNf6X+SJ/7wMTLeSTYkavOsp5RtN8ljQrY4rGA/SjYMhYoYxtnFa3UmXWMNdfc b5MtGUVf2umZEh7fwqgqBm8nMUcjihMcZuwxo89VhhHdLzmdqD7Jj+PGfq8bOu/g2Fo2 vk5xJ5hSMefqwmjT45aylOW46nODIJybDsfDkVOytVp8/iRzqXYiIEcdP56MB4zx1/op zYMg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from:arc-authentication-results; bh=X2cK6VSY+Xnww6MbwWzO0HJVFMars0v12ef40BxqV/A=; b=VVUqmnltasZHVnE6MNPdxnzgCy4vSLkZZY2AukTSWvx9AnI3ijZBNI8E+Zl9zO967V VY7Sq89XqBBtH+Gx37ARTH368B0L+zAtqhXBSHex13xFQdR0RpuZYvhSZ4q321T8/OTU 651Lq5ttFE/MnuO3B9Ky3J3m4V1daco0N/wRHDjcZtcu6yrAVjh/wTMP3/Tcl0DP6wqB vrTBQ5oP0Pdo8YAoEAWaAFAaLHxeNhWDL71Zd/X91TLUZlSUtnD/pd9i90n9dzXtwbGx vxOs2HoktXHd+Cn68Polj2MAexnoIhewNVbFGFSWcZHta6kxGzrP33BQ1BIPsLAh01Dn l4dA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c17-v6si8966718pge.273.2018.08.20.02.46.34; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 02:46:49 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726653AbeHTM7m (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 20 Aug 2018 08:59:42 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:34856 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726010AbeHTM7l (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Aug 2018 08:59:41 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 852621684; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 02:44:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from queper01-lin.local (queper01-lin.emea.arm.com [10.4.13.27]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4AA973F2EA; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 02:44:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Quentin Perret To: peterz@infradead.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, mingo@redhat.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com, chris.redpath@arm.com, patrick.bellasi@arm.com, valentin.schneider@arm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, thara.gopinath@linaro.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, tkjos@google.com, joel@joelfernandes.org, smuckle@google.com, adharmap@codeaurora.org, skannan@codeaurora.org, pkondeti@codeaurora.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com, edubezval@gmail.com, srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com, currojerez@riseup.net, javi.merino@kernel.org, quentin.perret@arm.com Subject: [PATCH v6 03/14] PM: Introduce an Energy Model management framework Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 10:44:09 +0100 Message-Id: <20180820094420.26590-4-quentin.perret@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20180820094420.26590-1-quentin.perret@arm.com> References: <20180820094420.26590-1-quentin.perret@arm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Several subsystems in the kernel (task scheduler and/or thermal at the time of writing) can benefit from knowing about the energy consumed by CPUs. Yet, this information can come from different sources (DT or firmware for example), in different formats, hence making it hard to exploit without a standard API. As an attempt to address this, introduce a centralized Energy Model (EM) management framework which aggregates the power values provided by drivers into a table for each performance domain in the system. The power cost tables are made available to interested clients (e.g. task scheduler or thermal) via platform-agnostic APIs. The overall design is represented by the diagram below (focused on Arm-related drivers as an example, but applicable to any architecture): +---------------+ +-----------------+ +-------------+ | Thermal (IPA) | | Scheduler (EAS) | | Other | +---------------+ +-----------------+ +-------------+ | | em_pd_energy() | | | em_cpu_get() | +-----------+ | +----------+ | | | v v v +---------------------+ | | | Energy Model | | | | Framework | | | +---------------------+ ^ ^ ^ | | | em_register_perf_domain() +----------+ | +---------+ | | | +---------------+ +---------------+ +--------------+ | cpufreq-dt | | arm_scmi | | Other | +---------------+ +---------------+ +--------------+ ^ ^ ^ | | | +--------------+ +---------------+ +--------------+ | Device Tree | | Firmware | | ? | +--------------+ +---------------+ +--------------+ Drivers (typically, but not limited to, CPUFreq drivers) can register data in the EM framework using the em_register_perf_domain() API. The calling driver must provide a callback function with a standardized signature that will be used by the EM framework to build the power cost tables of the performance domain. This design should offer a lot of flexibility to calling drivers which are free of reading information from any location and to use any technique to compute power costs. Moreover, the capacity states registered by drivers in the EM framework are not required to match real performance states of the target. This is particularly important on targets where the performance states are not known by the OS. The power cost coefficients managed by the EM framework are specified in milli-watts. Although the two potential users of those coefficients (IPA and EAS) only need relative correctness, IPA specifically needs to compare the power of CPUs with the power of other components (GPUs, for example), which are still expressed in absolute terms in their respective subsystems. Hence, specifiying the power of CPUs in milli-watts should help transitioning IPA to using the EM framework without introducing new problems by keeping units comparable across sub-systems. On the longer term, the EM of other devices than CPUs could also be managed by the EM framework, which would enable to remove the absolute unit. However, this is not absolutely required as a first step, so this extension of the EM framework is left for later. On the client side, the EM framework offers APIs to access the power cost tables of a CPU (em_cpu_get()), and to estimate the energy consumed by the CPUs of a performance domain (em_pd_energy()). Clients such as the task scheduler can then use these APIs to access the shared data structures holding the Energy Model of CPUs. Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret --- include/linux/energy_model.h | 161 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ kernel/power/Kconfig | 15 +++ kernel/power/Makefile | 2 + kernel/power/energy_model.c | 199 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 377 insertions(+) create mode 100644 include/linux/energy_model.h create mode 100644 kernel/power/energy_model.c diff --git a/include/linux/energy_model.h b/include/linux/energy_model.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..b89b5596c976 --- /dev/null +++ b/include/linux/energy_model.h @@ -0,0 +1,161 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +#ifndef _LINUX_ENERGY_MODEL_H +#define _LINUX_ENERGY_MODEL_H +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include + +#ifdef CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL +struct em_cap_state { + unsigned long frequency; /* Kilo-hertz */ + unsigned long power; /* Milli-watts */ + unsigned long cost; /* power * max_frequency / frequency */ +}; + +struct em_perf_domain { + struct em_cap_state *table; /* Capacity states, in ascending order. */ + int nr_cap_states; + unsigned long cpus[0]; /* CPUs of the frequency domain. */ +}; + +#define EM_CPU_MAX_POWER 0xFFFF + +struct em_data_callback { + /** + * active_power() - Provide power at the next capacity state of a CPU + * @power : Active power at the capacity state in mW (modified) + * @freq : Frequency at the capacity state in kHz (modified) + * @cpu : CPU for which we do this operation + * + * active_power() must find the lowest capacity state of 'cpu' above + * 'freq' and update 'power' and 'freq' to the matching active power + * and frequency. + * + * The power is the one of a single CPU in the domain, expressed in + * milli-watts. It is expected to fit in the [0, EM_CPU_MAX_POWER] + * range. + * + * Return 0 on success. + */ + int (*active_power)(unsigned long *power, unsigned long *freq, int cpu); +}; +#define EM_DATA_CB(_active_power_cb) { .active_power = &_active_power_cb } + +struct em_perf_domain *em_cpu_get(int cpu); +int em_register_perf_domain(cpumask_t *span, unsigned int nr_states, + struct em_data_callback *cb); + +/** + * em_pd_energy() - Estimates the energy consumed by the CPUs of a perf. domain + * @pd : performance domain for which energy has to be estimated + * @max_util : highest utilization among CPUs of the domain + * @sum_util : sum of the utilization of all CPUs in the domain + * + * Return: the sum of the energy consumed by the CPUs of the domain assuming + * a capacity state satisfying the max utilization of the domain. + */ +static inline unsigned long em_pd_energy(struct em_perf_domain *pd, + unsigned long max_util, unsigned long sum_util) +{ + unsigned long freq, scale_cpu; + struct em_cap_state *cs; + int i, cpu; + + /* + * In order to predict the capacity state, map the utilization of the + * most utilized CPU of the performance domain to a requested frequency, + * like schedutil. + */ + cpu = cpumask_first(to_cpumask(pd->cpus)); + scale_cpu = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(NULL, cpu); + cs = &pd->table[pd->nr_cap_states - 1]; + freq = map_util_freq(max_util, cs->frequency, scale_cpu); + + /* + * Find the lowest capacity state of the Energy Model above the + * requested frequency. + */ + for (i = 0; i < pd->nr_cap_states; i++) { + cs = &pd->table[i]; + if (cs->frequency >= freq) + break; + } + + /* + * The capacity of a CPU in the domain at that capacity state (cs) + * can be computed as: + * + * cs->freq * scale_cpu + * cs->cap = -------------------- (1) + * cpu_max_freq + * + * So, the energy consumed by this CPU at that capacity state is: + * + * cs->power * cpu_util + * cpu_nrg = -------------------- (2) + * cs->cap + * + * since 'cpu_util / cs->cap' represents its percentage of busy time. + * By injecting (1) in (2), 'cpu_nrg' can be re-expressed as a product + * of two terms: + * + * cs->power * cpu_max_freq cpu_util + * cpu_nrg = ------------------------ * --------- (3) + * cs->freq scale_cpu + * + * The first term is static, and is stored in the em_cap_state struct + * as 'cs->cost'. + * + * Since all CPUs of the domain have the same micro-architecture, they + * share the same 'cs->cost', and the same CPU capacity. Hence, the + * total energy of the domain (which is the simple sum of the energy of + * all of its CPUs) can be factorized as: + * + * cs->cost * \Sum cpu_util + * pd_nrg = ------------------------ (4) + * scale_cpu + */ + return cs->cost * sum_util / scale_cpu; +} + +/** + * em_pd_nr_cap_states() - Get the number of capacity states of a perf. domain + * @pd : performance domain for which this must be done + * + * Return: the number of capacity states in the performance domain table + */ +static inline int em_pd_nr_cap_states(struct em_perf_domain *pd) +{ + return pd->nr_cap_states; +} + +#else +struct em_perf_domain {}; +struct em_data_callback {}; +#define EM_DATA_CB(_active_power_cb) { } + +static inline int em_register_perf_domain(cpumask_t *span, + unsigned int nr_states, struct em_data_callback *cb) +{ + return -EINVAL; +} +static inline struct em_perf_domain *em_cpu_get(int cpu) +{ + return NULL; +} +static inline unsigned long em_pd_energy(struct em_perf_domain *pd, + unsigned long max_util, unsigned long sum_util) +{ + return 0; +} +static inline int em_pd_nr_cap_states(struct em_perf_domain *pd) +{ + return 0; +} +#endif + +#endif diff --git a/kernel/power/Kconfig b/kernel/power/Kconfig index e880ca22c5a5..6f6db452dc7d 100644 --- a/kernel/power/Kconfig +++ b/kernel/power/Kconfig @@ -297,3 +297,18 @@ config PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS_OF config CPU_PM bool + +config ENERGY_MODEL + bool "Energy Model for CPUs" + depends on SMP + depends on CPU_FREQ + default n + help + Several subsystems (thermal and/or the task scheduler for example) + can leverage information about the energy consumed by CPUs to make + smarter decisions. This config option enables the framework from + which subsystems can access the energy models. + + The exact usage of the energy model is subsystem-dependent. + + If in doubt, say N. diff --git a/kernel/power/Makefile b/kernel/power/Makefile index a3f79f0eef36..e7e47d9be1e5 100644 --- a/kernel/power/Makefile +++ b/kernel/power/Makefile @@ -15,3 +15,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PM_AUTOSLEEP) += autosleep.o obj-$(CONFIG_PM_WAKELOCKS) += wakelock.o obj-$(CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ) += poweroff.o + +obj-$(CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL) += energy_model.o diff --git a/kernel/power/energy_model.c b/kernel/power/energy_model.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..2aa6f94343d0 --- /dev/null +++ b/kernel/power/energy_model.c @@ -0,0 +1,199 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * Energy Model of CPUs + * + * Copyright (c) 2018, Arm ltd. + * Written by: Quentin Perret, Arm ltd. + */ + +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "energy_model: " fmt + +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include + +/* Mapping of each CPU to the performance domain to which it belongs. */ +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct em_perf_domain *, em_data); + +/* + * Mutex serializing the registrations of performance domains and letting + * callbacks defined by drivers sleep. + */ +static DEFINE_MUTEX(em_pd_mutex); + +static struct em_perf_domain *em_create_pd(cpumask_t *span, int nr_states, + struct em_data_callback *cb) +{ + unsigned long opp_eff, prev_opp_eff = ULONG_MAX; + unsigned long power, freq, prev_freq = 0; + int i, ret, cpu = cpumask_first(span); + struct em_cap_state *table; + struct em_perf_domain *pd; + u64 fmax; + + if (!cb->active_power) + return NULL; + + pd = kzalloc(sizeof(*pd) + cpumask_size(), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!pd) + return NULL; + + table = kcalloc(nr_states, sizeof(*table), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!table) + goto free_pd; + + /* Build the list of capacity states for this performance domain */ + for (i = 0, freq = 0; i < nr_states; i++, freq++) { + /* + * active_power() is a driver callback which ceils 'freq' to + * lowest capacity state of 'cpu' above 'freq' and updates + * 'power' and 'freq' accordingly. + */ + ret = cb->active_power(&power, &freq, cpu); + if (ret) { + pr_err("pd%d: invalid cap. state: %d\n", cpu, ret); + goto free_cs_table; + } + + /* + * We expect the driver callback to increase the frequency for + * higher capacity states. + */ + if (freq <= prev_freq) { + pr_err("pd%d: non-increasing freq: %lu\n", cpu, freq); + goto free_cs_table; + } + + /* + * The power returned by active_state() is expected to be in + * milli-watts and to fit into 16 bits. + */ + if (power > EM_CPU_MAX_POWER) { + pr_err("pd%d: power out of scale: %lu\n", cpu, power); + goto free_cs_table; + } + + table[i].power = power; + table[i].frequency = prev_freq = freq; + + /* + * The hertz/watts efficiency ratio should decrease as the + * frequency grows on sane platforms. But this isn't always + * true in practice so warn the user if a higher OPP is more + * power efficient than a lower one. + */ + opp_eff = freq / power; + if (opp_eff >= prev_opp_eff) + pr_warn("pd%d: hertz/watts ratio non-monotonically decreasing: OPP%d >= OPP%d\n", + cpu, i, i - 1); + prev_opp_eff = opp_eff; + } + + /* Compute the cost of each capacity_state. */ + fmax = (u64) table[nr_states - 1].frequency; + for (i = 0; i < nr_states; i++) { + table[i].cost = div64_u64(fmax * table[i].power, + table[i].frequency); + } + + pd->table = table; + pd->nr_cap_states = nr_states; + cpumask_copy(to_cpumask(pd->cpus), span); + + return pd; + +free_cs_table: + kfree(table); +free_pd: + kfree(pd); + + return NULL; +} + +/** + * em_cpu_get() - Return the performance domain for a CPU + * @cpu : CPU to find the performance domain for + * + * Return: the performance domain to which 'cpu' belongs, or NULL if it doesn't + * exist. + */ +struct em_perf_domain *em_cpu_get(int cpu) +{ + return READ_ONCE(per_cpu(em_data, cpu)); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(em_cpu_get); + +/** + * em_register_perf_domain() - Register the Energy Model of a performance domain + * @span : Mask of CPUs in the performance domain + * @nr_states : Number of capacity states to register + * @cb : Callback functions providing the data of the Energy Model + * + * Create Energy Model tables for a performance domain using the callbacks + * defined in cb. + * + * If multiple clients register the same performance domain, all but the first + * registration will be ignored. + * + * Return 0 on success + */ +int em_register_perf_domain(cpumask_t *span, unsigned int nr_states, + struct em_data_callback *cb) +{ + unsigned long cap, prev_cap = 0; + struct em_perf_domain *pd; + int cpu, ret = 0; + + if (!span || !nr_states || !cb) + return -EINVAL; + + /* + * Use a mutex to serialize the registration of performance domains and + * let the driver-defined callback functions sleep. + */ + mutex_lock(&em_pd_mutex); + + for_each_cpu(cpu, span) { + /* Make sure we don't register again an existing domain. */ + if (READ_ONCE(per_cpu(em_data, cpu))) { + ret = -EEXIST; + goto unlock; + } + + /* + * All CPUs of a domain must have the same micro-architecture + * since they all share the same table. + */ + cap = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(NULL, cpu); + if (prev_cap && prev_cap != cap) { + pr_err("CPUs of %*pbl must have the same capacity\n", + cpumask_pr_args(span)); + ret = -EINVAL; + goto unlock; + } + prev_cap = cap; + } + + /* Create the performance domain and add it to the Energy Model. */ + pd = em_create_pd(span, nr_states, cb); + if (!pd) { + ret = -EINVAL; + goto unlock; + } + + for_each_cpu(cpu, span) { + /* + * The per-cpu array can be concurrently accessed from + * em_cpu_get(). + */ + smp_store_release(per_cpu_ptr(&em_data, cpu), pd); + } + + pr_debug("Created perf domain %*pbl\n", cpumask_pr_args(span)); +unlock: + mutex_unlock(&em_pd_mutex); + return ret; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(em_register_perf_domain); -- 2.17.1