Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp3702636imm; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 03:20:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPxPSbBhtP0frCdtwQjJqNgNVSSaIwtSTBsFrt9sUV2dhwjlDdY/Qh1sWNDjkCQg7hPQ59+X X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b08d:: with SMTP id p13-v6mr45557901plr.0.1534760402406; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 03:20:02 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1534760402; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=eX160zzG/fAamiPAlrsUlG6vqx58V3EZvjePRTFf7PB4HkDNxo9nsY6cL/5UR6oc/C 3cZpNuHgakbeNIpVV4Qpv8oao5YgjOHKriXAbE2anMu5/27KozNsyqyv0RSvonxtVtXP PNPj30qmtXYGqfotkF3/neHkQLxctL/QJw5WTu0TdyRby1iLPCW4llg3tEvFIK0kQyG2 +Pnv5ScITXWfaTkYTt5uQaRle/fl3Kd+cj/Lbh5Ty+s6R76e3iHSKUHh/mZ+zjeia0w0 n+LUFtzVV8yxieouuhO9H+yyoUU8zdL3ctrEMp5exzdOHzXvzqoIIRGByME0DdNNOW8v YMEw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=8961MbzPJpKxiTvInc8jfCL6v34lkF4GtvkzQKOMYy0=; b=x0r/1u/X4qxaxFVf6Uipvo5ex4RUsLtrSHVqHgikSAXugA7paoxTBBba1GI5Z7fO3b 45pYG0xlEQfNawwzzZdiZ3G0jAc4DbICMWTXAxtXnfRHKE0lAFPKHmMj0aG52m62CB7d NeMtFzU4RUaOaDCgn6V8jefbRQB7rqMo308XUQFB7jejbn0WkrkpnIiwWAj7YYjLl44a koabj5Kz5obmot7Jo4PK8KBoP+zChtBJrZ4j8+ayg0dzhuDDYTfSAXqtTsXpZtVYqirI DNi0eAvsn9G4XYJYr2i2ZoIwjsBlrDymzrgD7lxfFsqrTwf3ROw8NOdiJhfMcm9LKgYx jdsw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 194-v6si9881519pfz.101.2018.08.20.03.19.47; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 03:20:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726631AbeHTNdq (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 20 Aug 2018 09:33:46 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:35626 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725948AbeHTNdq (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Aug 2018 09:33:46 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4885480D; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 03:18:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [0.0.0.0] (e107985-lin.emea.arm.com [10.4.12.239]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EEB3D3F2EA; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 03:18:41 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/14] sched/core: uclamp: add system default clamps To: Patrick Bellasi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Cc: Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Tejun Heo , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , Vincent Guittot , Paul Turner , Morten Rasmussen , Juri Lelli , Todd Kjos , Joel Fernandes , Steve Muckle , Suren Baghdasaryan References: <20180806163946.28380-1-patrick.bellasi@arm.com> <20180806163946.28380-13-patrick.bellasi@arm.com> From: Dietmar Eggemann Message-ID: <2816b340-ca91-4d09-1610-df05a9893da2@arm.com> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 12:18:40 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180806163946.28380-13-patrick.bellasi@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08/06/2018 06:39 PM, Patrick Bellasi wrote: > Clamp values cannot be tuned at the root cgroup level. Moreover, because > of the delegation model requirements and how the parent clamps > propagation works, if we want to enable subgroups to set a non null > util.min, we need to be able to configure the root group util.min to the > allow the maximum utilization (SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE = 1024). Why 1024 (100)? Would any non 0 value work here? [...] > @@ -1269,6 +1296,75 @@ static inline void uclamp_group_get(struct task_struct *p, > uclamp_group_put(clamp_id, prev_group_id); > } > > +int sched_uclamp_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write, > + void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, > + loff_t *ppos) > +{ > + int group_id[UCLAMP_CNT] = { UCLAMP_NOT_VALID }; > + struct uclamp_se *uc_se; > + int old_min, old_max; > + int result; > + > + mutex_lock(&uclamp_mutex); > + > + old_min = sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_min; > + old_max = sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_max; > + > + result = proc_dointvec(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos); > + if (result) > + goto undo; > + if (!write) > + goto done; > + > + if (sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_min > sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_max) > + goto undo; > + if (sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_max > 1024) > + goto undo; > + > + /* Find a valid group_id for each required clamp value */ > + if (old_min != sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_min) { > + result = uclamp_group_find(UCLAMP_MIN, sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_min); > + if (result == -ENOSPC) { > + pr_err("Cannot allocate more than %d UTIL_MIN clamp groups\n", > + CONFIG_UCLAMP_GROUPS_COUNT); > + goto undo; > + } > + group_id[UCLAMP_MIN] = result; > + } > + if (old_max != sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_max) { > + result = uclamp_group_find(UCLAMP_MAX, sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_max); > + if (result == -ENOSPC) { > + pr_err("Cannot allocate more than %d UTIL_MAX clamp groups\n", > + CONFIG_UCLAMP_GROUPS_COUNT); > + goto undo; > + } > + group_id[UCLAMP_MAX] = result; > + } > + > + /* Update each required clamp group */ > + if (old_min != sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_min) { > + uc_se = &uclamp_default[UCLAMP_MIN]; > + uclamp_group_get(NULL, UCLAMP_MIN, group_id[UCLAMP_MIN], > + uc_se, sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_min); > + } > + if (old_max != sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_max) { > + uc_se = &uclamp_default[UCLAMP_MAX]; > + uclamp_group_get(NULL, UCLAMP_MAX, group_id[UCLAMP_MAX], > + uc_se, sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_max); > + } > + > + if (result) { > +undo: > + sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_min = old_min; > + sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_max = old_max; > + } This looks strange! In case uclamp_group_find() returns free_group_id instead of -ENOSPC, the sysctl min/max values are reset? I was under the assumption that I could specify: sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_min = 40 (for boosting) sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_max = 80 (for clamping) with an empty cpu controller hierarchy and then those values become the .effective values of (a first level) task group? [...]