Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 20 Aug 2018 20:06:21 +0800
In-Reply-To: <20180820120046.7tonxtb52q43ocfq@flea>
References: <20180724163655.61365-1-icenowy@aosc.io> <20180726124119.dwne2sncws2p3sdi@flea> <dc8a28bcfbe082158bac5b097badb3ddf0f51ce8.camel@aosc.io> <20180820120046.7tonxtb52q43ocfq@flea>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: sun8i: r40/v40: rewrite BPi M2 Berry DTS to rebase on M2 Ultra
To:     linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
CC:     devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
        linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
From:   Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io>
Message-ID: <2782CDF6-C36F-49EF-97AE-75382C416489@aosc.io>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


于 2018年8月20日 GMT+08:00 下午8:00:46, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> 写到:
>Hi!
>
>On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 06:36:56PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>> 在 2018-07-26四的 14:41 +0200，Maxime Ripard写道：
>> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 12:36:55AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>> > > Banana Pi designs the BPi M2 Berry board to be software
>compatible
>> > > with
>> > > BPi M2 Ultra,
>> > 
>> > Do you have a reference for this?
>> > 
>> > > so it's based on M2 Ultra with some function cuts, including:
>> > > 
>> > > - 2048MiB DRAM -> 1024MiB (this should be proceed by the
>> > > bootloader);
>> > > - dropped a LED;
>> > > - dropped eMMC;
>> > > - dropped USB2 and connect USB1 to a 4-port HUB.
>> > 
>> > Is it the exhaustive list?
>> 
>> I have asked Mikey from Sinovoip, and he has agreed this.
>> 
>> Here's a list provided by him, which covers some things I forgot:
>> - 2GiB -> 1GiB
>> - no eMMC
>> - no onboard microphone
>> - no IR
>> - no charging (and power jack to USB)
>> - USB change
>> - one less LED
>> 
>> Should I add this to the device tree's comment?
>
>Not really, because...
>
>> > 
>> > I'm a bit reluctant to merge that kind of patches usually, since
>that
>> > would also imply that each time someone will commit something to
>the
>> > M2-Ultra, it would automatically apply to the M2-Berry, without any
>> > easy way to tell and / or test.
>
>... this still applies.

But I think few developers will have both boards at the same time.

>
>Maxime