Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mux: adgs1408: use the correct SPDX license identifier
To:     "Caprioru, Mircea" <Mircea.Caprioru@analog.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <209EE0F380CD554C95B3E2532952872D29ABC204@NWD2MBX7.ad.analog.com>
 <20180820103827.24639-1-peda@axentia.se>
 <209EE0F380CD554C95B3E2532952872D29ABC21F@NWD2MBX7.ad.analog.com>
From:   Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
Organization: Axentia Technologies AB
Message-ID: <12688e68-141f-4bda-ae62-38dd54654334@axentia.se>
Date:   Mon, 20 Aug 2018 14:30:55 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <209EE0F380CD554C95B3E2532952872D29ABC21F@NWD2MBX7.ad.analog.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: None (protection.outlook.com: axentia.se does not designate
 permitted sender hosts)
SpamDiagnosticOutput: 1:99
SpamDiagnosticMetadata: NSPM
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Aug 2018 12:30:59.3735 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: a5d23b1f-aaaf-4682-2a20-08d60698c8fa
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 4ee68585-03e1-4785-942a-df9c1871a234
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VI1PR0201MB2464
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 2018-08-20 13:14, Caprioru, Mircea wrote:
> Ok now I understand.  We can go with GPL-2.0-or-later and MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"). 
> We are pretty flexible regarding what license we should use upstream wise. If> you feel we should change it in some other way we can do that too. 

Good, I'll just add your ack on the original patch. Both v2 and v2-or-later
are obviously fine and I don't care either way, I just didn't like the
discrepancy. The SPDX id is normally trumping the module-license tag so the
original patch feels like the lesser change. No need to stir the bowl...

Cheers,
Peter

> 
> Regards,
> Mircea
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Rosin [mailto:peda@axentia.se] 
> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2018 1:38 PM
> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>; Caprioru, Mircea <Mircea.Caprioru@analog.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] mux: adgs1408: use the correct SPDX license identifier
> 
> The file is GPL v2 only.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
> ---
>  drivers/mux/adgs1408.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> On 2018-08-20 12:16, Caprioru, Mircea wrote:
>> Peter Rosin wrote:
>>> I just noticed a discrepancy in the license annotations in your 
>>> driver. The SPDX license identifier says GPL-2.0-or-later, and I 
>>> assume that is correct and that MODULE_LICENSE("GPL") without the v2 
>>> specifier, as in this patch, is the correct thing to do?
>>
>> The file should be v2. It might of slipped from the final version.
> 
> Ok, so I read that as if it should be v2 *only* and not v2-or-later.
> I.e. the reverse of the original patch. But since these things can be sensitive, I'd like confirmation that this new patch is what is correct...
> 
> Note that MODULE_LICENSE("GPL") means GPL v2 *or later* (GPL v1 is not on the table), while MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2") means GPL v2 *only*.
> See include/linux/module.h for details.
> 
> Cheers,
> Peter
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mux/adgs1408.c b/drivers/mux/adgs1408.c index 0f7cf54e3234..fe0377bb83eb 100644
> --- a/drivers/mux/adgs1408.c
> +++ b/drivers/mux/adgs1408.c
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>  /*
>   * ADGS1408/ADGS1409 SPI MUX driver
>   *
> --
> 2.11.0
> 
>