Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp4065583imm; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 09:12:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPxpE5K++BR9A/z/gY/Acsj4aA+coI71HBpkEMEHjLxQVJ5k71t1benwmoG1A9LWLQn4Bqp/ X-Received: by 2002:a65:64c8:: with SMTP id t8-v6mr12473296pgv.110.1534781577095; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 09:12:57 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1534781577; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ZN6oTtK1LuC9NWW4iitsU5Zhf73MHvUDBywv/zf9qmV3aZ4pISSR4GPN2maSpupBq6 ZIcRYe/xQ++raR24Y9Fqd4l6WlB4utf+GmN7SE5bw1fMBuBaBNcJvY4jMW+qlQtzkSFG IVdU61N1dIwamIwswz5WXar5XCrdt2pL+TOuspzqmzdBrSVNW8TZqfHySqIXoSBKaqf6 SplbTsi0Wq/OGml2E7VpefbtCK6hn1EivFvRmh1yrJUR4tUXT6hq4TnRRXzMziCgZXTm 6ehzItn1KJy64AcHsSo+bTEnq5yMQ1DdYxXcZ6TlTkDqIDbYFc9RY3tREorIHAHo+4p3 zl8A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=m+4T+rbImOVTmCdZyzQlRK0sTEdtYrVXW8RqtHnieEk=; b=BJo6UpzSmSTEA657CEK6X3ygAjipXpPm2LLI980kzeBsAyLONUV7HC0hmb8WuBL5WW kMf9v7NHF+vRPdptiVVzmlUOUZetHsrFlkj88XCDavDd5nCf324fziWSxtaDmztY2T1B VJsid2Mi/mX4eZ2YgtLt99RBiFOoS+fNTKzfMW4wgX94+3b2YTBs6UBi/sOdnm5epEMl f+FcVZBl+UP/1TAOf+gFqDD+qlM6VF7yeGC4fBu3bdt5qUE8EG8oe4UiZo8tSY5MkRoU oIE0+CByhkarPz3pnQApI4wh6eKkIJJdivc0NQNmnD0cF0fWcZaxnDaMr3jW4lW0fq2I bOjA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x136-v6si10233624pfd.124.2018.08.20.09.12.40; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 09:12:57 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726483AbeHTTDY (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 20 Aug 2018 15:03:24 -0400 Received: from www381.your-server.de ([78.46.137.84]:50436 "EHLO www381.your-server.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726024AbeHTTDY (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Aug 2018 15:03:24 -0400 Received: from [78.46.172.2] (helo=sslproxy05.your-server.de) by www381.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89_1) (envelope-from ) id 1frmOb-0003ZZ-Q3; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 17:47:09 +0200 Received: from [2003:93:4e1f:ab00:8200:bff:fe9b:6612] by sslproxy05.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1frmOb-000Ito-KN; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 17:47:09 +0200 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] iio: adxl372: Provide validate_trigger and validate_device callbacks To: Stefan Popa , jic23@kernel.org Cc: Michael.Hennerich@analog.com, knaack.h@gmx.de, pmeerw@pmeerw.net, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1534776823-18703-1-git-send-email-stefan.popa@analog.com> From: Lars-Peter Clausen Message-ID: <1fc5f7bb-67d1-fa03-2242-b38b94a151ee@metafoo.de> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 17:47:08 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1534776823-18703-1-git-send-email-stefan.popa@analog.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-Sender: lars@metafoo.de X-Virus-Scanned: Clear (ClamAV 0.100.1/24859/Mon Aug 20 10:44:44 2018) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08/20/2018 04:53 PM, Stefan Popa wrote: > This patch provides a validate_device callback for the trigger which makes > sure that other devices are rejected. > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Popa --- > drivers/iio/accel/adxl372.c | 13 +++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/adxl372.c b/drivers/iio/accel/adxl372.c > index d2fdc75..5a039ba 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/accel/adxl372.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/adxl372.c > @@ -762,11 +762,24 @@ static int adxl372_dready_trig_set_state(struct iio_trigger *trig, > return adxl372_set_interrupts(st, mask, 0); > } > > +static int adxl372_validate_trigger(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, > + struct iio_trigger *trig) > +{ > + struct adxl372_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev); > + > + if (st->dready_trig != trig) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > static const struct iio_trigger_ops adxl372_trigger_ops = { > + .validate_device = &iio_trigger_validate_own_device, > .set_trigger_state = adxl372_dready_trig_set_state, > }; > > static const struct iio_info adxl372_info = { > + .validate_trigger = &adxl372_validate_trigger, I wonder, if the device only works with the trigger and the trigger only works with the device should we actually register a trigger? Seems to be just extra hassle when setting up the device without any extra benefits.