Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261235AbTI3Iz2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Sep 2003 04:55:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261236AbTI3Iz2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Sep 2003 04:55:28 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:4992 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261235AbTI3Iz0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Sep 2003 04:55:26 -0400 Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 01:51:25 -0700 From: "David S. Miller" To: David Woodhouse Cc: bunk@fs.tum.de, acme@conectiva.com.br, netdev@oss.sgi.com, pekkas@netcore.fi, lksctp-developers@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] disallow modular IPv6 Message-Id: <20030930015125.5de36d97.davem@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1064911360.21551.49.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> References: <20030928225941.GW15338@fs.tum.de> <20030928231842.GE1039@conectiva.com.br> <20030928232403.GX15338@fs.tum.de> <20030929220916.19c9c90d.davem@redhat.com> <1064903562.6154.160.camel@imladris.demon.co.uk> <20030930000302.3e1bf8bb.davem@redhat.com> <1064907572.21551.31.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> <20030930010855.095c2c35.davem@redhat.com> <1064910398.21551.41.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> <20030930013025.697c786e.davem@redhat.com> <1064911360.21551.49.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.2 (GTK+ 1.2.6; sparc-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 09:42:41 +0100 David Woodhouse wrote: > 'make modules' should make the modules. If for some reason this really > does require the core kernel image to be present and up to date, perhaps > for modversions, then I agree that it should also rebuild the core > kernel. So it's OK for modversions to make modules depend upon the main kernel image, but it's not OK for ipv6 to do the same exact thing. Is this what you're saying? > If there's no actual dependency on the core kernel image, however, then > it should not be rebuilt for 'make modules'. If 'make modules' was > equivalent to 'make all' then it should not exist at all. I don't see how you can say that modversions can create this module dependency upon the kernel image, but ipv6 is not allowed to. And this doesn't turn 'make modules' into the same thing as 'make all'. It will still behave differently in a lot of situations. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/