Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261271AbTI3Jo6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Sep 2003 05:44:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261277AbTI3Jo6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Sep 2003 05:44:58 -0400 Received: from smtp.sys.beep.pl ([195.245.198.13]:1549 "EHLO maja.beep.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261271AbTI3Joz convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Sep 2003 05:44:55 -0400 From: Arkadiusz Miskiewicz Organization: SelfOrganizing To: David Brownell , Greg KH Subject: Re: USB problem. 'irq 9: nobody cared!' (FIXED!) Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 11:41:18 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 Cc: Milton Miller , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200309242257.h8OMvR5d090443@sullivan.realtime.net> <20030925180020.GB28876@kroah.com> <3F733DF1.7010008@pacbell.net> In-Reply-To: <3F733DF1.7010008@pacbell.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200309301141.18595.arekm@pld-linux.org> X-Authenticated-Id: arekm Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 25 of September 2003 21:11, David Brownell wrote: > The problem is that nobody has ever reported back with results from > testing any updated patch (see attachment, the guts of this being > from Alan Stern). Sort of makes trying be a moot point ... :) So I'm the first one? ;) Your patch (http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0309.3/0341.html) FIXES things for me :-) This time I've tried 2.6.0test6 + all acpi patches from 2.6.0-mm1 (ls *acpi* in akpm broken-out directory) + your patch and things work fine :) Note that 2.6.0+all acpi patches from 2.6.0-mm1 without your patch doesn't work. [arekm@mobarm arekm]$ cat /proc/interrupts CPU0 0: 698946 XT-PIC timer 1: 1712 XT-PIC i8042 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade 3: 1561 XT-PIC irda0 5: 4 XT-PIC yenta 8: 0 XT-PIC rtc 9: 2657 XT-PIC acpi, eth0 10: 77708 XT-PIC VIA686A, uhci-hcd, uhci-hcd 12: 18 XT-PIC i8042 14: 12408 XT-PIC ide0 15: 20 XT-PIC ide1 NMI: 0 ERR: 0 More details about my case in lkml archives and http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=905 > It's OK with me if you just revert the patch that adds a uhci_reset() > entry, but based on what I saw with EHCI and OHCI that'll just turn > up a different set of problems with certain BIOS configurations (none > of which I have) ... which will need to be fixed by having a UHCI > reset sequence that works correctly from _all_ initial states. > > - Dave -- Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz CS at FoE, Wroclaw University of Technology arekm.pld-linux.org AM2-6BONE, 1024/3DB19BBD, arekm(at)ircnet, PLD/Linux - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/