Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Pawel Laszczak <pawell@cadence.com>
To:     Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com>
CC:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
        Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Lukasz Tyrala <ltyrala@cadence.com>,
        Alan Douglas <adouglas@cadence.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 00/31] Introduced new Cadence USBSSP DRD Driver
Thread-Topic: [PATCH 00/31] Introduced new Cadence USBSSP DRD Driver
Thread-Index: AQHUH4o1bKndmEN6kkap8iKK8m7246TEnP8AgAXZleA=
Date:   Tue, 21 Aug 2018 14:50:19 +0000
Message-ID: <BYAPR07MB47091F95E8AB1400865E21DDDD310@BYAPR07MB4709.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <1532023084-28083-1-git-send-email-pawell@cadence.com>
 <20180817210534.GA11144@uda0271908>
In-Reply-To: <20180817210534.GA11144@uda0271908>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cadence.com does not designate
 permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: b0302a19-700c-467f-799c-08d607756a46
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 21 Aug 2018 14:50:19.3044
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: d36035c5-6ce6-4662-a3dc-e762e61ae4c9
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR07MB5048
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi,

USBSSP it's the project name and it was the reason for such prefix.

I agree with you that the shorter prefix could be better and we could get r=
id of some warnings reported by checkpatch. Currently we have more importan=
t issues related to testing and debugging driver so decision about change I=
 leave for the feature.   Such modification could be made as separate singl=
e patch.=20

Cheers,
Pawel=20
>=20
> Hi,
>=20
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 06:57:33PM +0100, Pawel Laszczak wrote:
> > This patch set introduce new Cadence USBSSP DRD driver
> > to linux kernel.
>=20
> Does the driver have to use 'usbssp' as the controller prefix? Is 'ssp'
> acceptable? It would make the tons of variable names shorter and the
> code much cleaner to read.
>=20
> Regards,
> -Bin.