Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m35-v6csp1280376imm; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 23:48:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPwh33SvAKAxKmBiN8CoAgXeZbDyoaPyCSSoNI80FY0VzFe1XBMbZE6Ph8eG4khPA77Xnq1x X-Received: by 2002:a63:e206:: with SMTP id q6-v6mr53885254pgh.223.1535006899649; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 23:48:19 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1535006899; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=r7Efoda8Qfy0hQT5D1OyICweQ+pMUiYMBe855jbXGCp2JUIPaB++9oGp38JqSbqljV 0X6Z8cc6VoaEf5jMnQ5O9+qureFK9wrONlQq+Eu6BYt0bV6hRtFGeGpca5kkvxQ01TQb 7IE2KySTfMLv49FY0m95fLP6FWOCGDHkxPfEAk/FXotYzbrwN8sl2tbftEJj4AbLLZ7I 84/SXh8LNcP2zLUgNG6ImX0PnfsNC0ivJqoh3hVPtI4TFhzNPiYCIiqUmI6ix5fRKaYF shE9Bpn36/B5yk4yHnKZqK2cMJjTihOs1Tu8fwxKxOwQj72hkAdUez6l6IAC7zhdQYym Rw5Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=cdS4ZpUnpq4l8FzzQ1HdkENML/c1gIUc7ZnqtpRvNdA=; b=U1aIG2lR0oRwLxNX+P3AGNLU4nLn4J0+1czSs6ygWSGAScqYZsTI3Zd3v7a/ivGuas Y8rtsLhH/XdybrgATDqnZRq4WOm5HOQUZoppOjNUOQOoqmdR+zP9xB5OOtEbhwtcDYxI QpfoB37lSdRQGYRx44GIIQtTXbjZ0ECXsh71Pw84PH7uUckGpTtMb6fqhRv6QAA/DPbc Pso2iadUeJAUey4cXzlAj1iE1HwEeAgrViMWHBO9Iz38+B0tWM9ZMFzqHacxHj8LKxFU w3Ar+8ElFdlRNj8qRJRgy0gmTaghbnRDITtZJMW7Z3k42O2LqeCfq9AHQOOdF43yty4l kzVw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=rhKuv3w7; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h127-v6si4076384pfg.292.2018.08.22.23.48.03; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 23:48:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=rhKuv3w7; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726438AbeHWKOf (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 23 Aug 2018 06:14:35 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f67.google.com ([209.85.218.67]:43212 "EHLO mail-oi0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726145AbeHWKOf (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Aug 2018 06:14:35 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-f67.google.com with SMTP id b15-v6so7476978oib.10 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 23:46:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=cdS4ZpUnpq4l8FzzQ1HdkENML/c1gIUc7ZnqtpRvNdA=; b=rhKuv3w7zb3KFaG5TmKpP8ZwvotOpvVtjrfj+zdCybZdJicpd/WgCOXFNFtX67tOg3 7sCXDOd/xh7D3JmKL+i2FJWBB+VjUTA9lft8lEg5APeLU4lkSZeFLlZNdUCrFAQr0jy1 59KKl+fKCcT14IOSp/nrJ4vodkjHUNJEQ4cZD/F1SVBtGlwqVij+1wQvPOW4Fyg0/4+v f90QTnsCAxaZ75PRB5jOqdTkV498gr5J/8ps8wZU17nojs2q8skB4+eQB/d7cC1xZn/c 4ErnrCyT2OvIssMohjyP24hA6/qMRsMJl3IUwFDEYEHtDsoL37HfrRZgBEOz9sA2ekHd 2JlA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=cdS4ZpUnpq4l8FzzQ1HdkENML/c1gIUc7ZnqtpRvNdA=; b=Ofgulm1PJWi6S9LF1v/nSCZU3UO6Dblx7zF94tx0fq/ZqAe6i0CSLxooqojiS1j+yg qbJ+kzJ15JWd2EwboA7zpVLtIxcVTM3NsiKo1tei/jitaKWs226n88tmfS2zvdx7CF65 BEiDvkysd6I0AMOF266/qIT4GaRRhzG0mKDmg40li4ic3KDbsT+Xajh82xPd1TgziQ3S tSod87OsFiV6sYu3xd0fDD8N5bs9749emMoNBA/HZ/cx/kUpsNyK4KoRCk5Ef5zpPfAU 0joAgOt7cvv7QMtR8ZyfnouURIAfsEIXWXolaCHT9h3j3Kbdw/rvbkb2FvfBdlDgKRT5 ECUQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51DRwmQH/jUxM8BoDyl95LNE3ffwv8moGwLp7W2LvVH6xBrt5QXh xx2pgKIDaxFwLAYO+gpHnOx8ZuEwwN5Eq6dMA+kdFg== X-Received: by 2002:aca:5512:: with SMTP id j18-v6mr6780882oib.17.1535006784835; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 23:46:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20180820201632.29229-1-jae.hyun.yoo@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20180820201632.29229-1-jae.hyun.yoo@linux.intel.com> From: Brendan Higgins Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 23:46:13 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH i2c-next v4] i2c: aspeed: Handle master/slave combined irq events properly To: jae.hyun.yoo@linux.intel.com Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Joel Stanley , Andrew Jeffery , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, OpenBMC Maillist , Linux ARM , linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com, james.feist@linux.intel.com, vernon.mauery@linux.intel.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 1:16 PM Jae Hyun Yoo wrote: > > In most of cases, interrupt bits are set one by one but there are > also a lot of other cases that Aspeed I2C IP sends multiple > interrupt bits with combining master and slave events using a > single interrupt call. It happens much more in multi-master > environment than single-master. For an example, when master is > waiting for a NORMAL_STOP interrupt in its MASTER_STOP state, > SLAVE_MATCH and RX_DONE interrupts could come along with the > NORMAL_STOP in case of an another master immediately sends data > just after acquiring the bus. In this case, the NORMAL_STOP > interrupt should be handled by master_irq and the SLAVE_MATCH and > RX_DONE interrupts should be handled by slave_irq. This commit > modifies irq hadling logic to handle the master/slave combined > events properly. > > Signed-off-by: Jae Hyun Yoo > --- > Changes since v3: > - Fixed typos in a comment. > > Changes since v2: > - Changed the name of ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_ERRORS to ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_MASTER_ERRORS > - Removed a member irq_status from the struct aspeed_i2c_bus and changed > master_irq and slave_irq handlers to make them return status_ack. > - Added a comment to explain why it needs to try both irq handlers. > > Changes since v1: > - Fixed a grammar issue in commit message. > - Added a missing line feed character into a message printing. > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++------------- > 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c > index a4f956c6d567..09eb4a9b355c 100644 > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c > @@ -82,6 +82,11 @@ > #define ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_RX_DONE BIT(2) > #define ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_TX_NAK BIT(1) > #define ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_TX_ACK BIT(0) > +#define ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_MASTER_ERRORS \ > + (ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_SDA_DL_TIMEOUT | \ > + ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_SCL_TIMEOUT | \ > + ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_ABNORMAL | \ > + ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_ARBIT_LOSS) > #define ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_ALL \ > (ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_SDA_DL_TIMEOUT | \ > ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_BUS_RECOVER_DONE | \ > @@ -227,20 +232,16 @@ static int aspeed_i2c_recover_bus(struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus) > } > > #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I2C_SLAVE) > -static bool aspeed_i2c_slave_irq(struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus) > +static u32 aspeed_i2c_slave_irq(struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus, u32 irq_status) > { > - u32 command, irq_status, status_ack = 0; > + u32 command, status_ack = 0; > struct i2c_client *slave = bus->slave; > - bool irq_handled = true; > u8 value; > > - if (!slave) { > - irq_handled = false; > - goto out; > - } > + if (!slave) > + return 0; > > command = readl(bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_CMD_REG); > - irq_status = readl(bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_INTR_STS_REG); > > /* Slave was requested, restart state machine. */ > if (irq_status & ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_SLAVE_MATCH) { > @@ -249,10 +250,8 @@ static bool aspeed_i2c_slave_irq(struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus) > } > > /* Slave is not currently active, irq was for someone else. */ > - if (bus->slave_state == ASPEED_I2C_SLAVE_STOP) { > - irq_handled = false; > - goto out; > - } > + if (bus->slave_state == ASPEED_I2C_SLAVE_STOP) > + return status_ack; > > dev_dbg(bus->dev, "slave irq status 0x%08x, cmd 0x%08x\n", > irq_status, command); > @@ -281,19 +280,19 @@ static bool aspeed_i2c_slave_irq(struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus) > status_ack |= ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_TX_NAK; > bus->slave_state = ASPEED_I2C_SLAVE_STOP; > } > + if (irq_status & ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_TX_ACK) > + status_ack |= ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_TX_ACK; > > switch (bus->slave_state) { > case ASPEED_I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED: > if (irq_status & ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_TX_ACK) > dev_err(bus->dev, "Unexpected ACK on read request.\n"); > bus->slave_state = ASPEED_I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED; > - > i2c_slave_event(slave, I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED, &value); > writel(value, bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_BYTE_BUF_REG); > writel(ASPEED_I2CD_S_TX_CMD, bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_CMD_REG); > break; > case ASPEED_I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED: > - status_ack |= ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_TX_ACK; > if (!(irq_status & ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_TX_ACK)) > dev_err(bus->dev, > "Expected ACK after processed read.\n"); > @@ -317,14 +316,7 @@ static bool aspeed_i2c_slave_irq(struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus) > break; > } > > - if (status_ack != irq_status) > - dev_err(bus->dev, > - "irq handled != irq. expected %x, but was %x\n", > - irq_status, status_ack); > - writel(status_ack, bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_INTR_STS_REG); > - > -out: > - return irq_handled; > + return status_ack; > } > #endif /* CONFIG_I2C_SLAVE */ > > @@ -380,21 +372,21 @@ static int aspeed_i2c_is_irq_error(u32 irq_status) > return 0; > } > > -static bool aspeed_i2c_master_irq(struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus) > +static u32 aspeed_i2c_master_irq(struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus, u32 irq_status) > { > - u32 irq_status, status_ack = 0, command = 0; > + u32 status_ack = 0, command = 0; > struct i2c_msg *msg; > u8 recv_byte; > int ret; > > - irq_status = readl(bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_INTR_STS_REG); > - /* Ack all interrupt bits. */ > - writel(irq_status, bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_INTR_STS_REG); > - > if (irq_status & ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_BUS_RECOVER_DONE) { > bus->master_state = ASPEED_I2C_MASTER_INACTIVE; > status_ack |= ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_BUS_RECOVER_DONE; > goto out_complete; > + } else { > + /* Master is not currently active, irq was for someone else. */ > + if (bus->master_state == ASPEED_I2C_MASTER_INACTIVE) > + goto out_no_complete; > } > > /* > @@ -403,19 +395,22 @@ static bool aspeed_i2c_master_irq(struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus) > * INACTIVE state. > */ > ret = aspeed_i2c_is_irq_error(irq_status); > - if (ret < 0) { > + if (ret) { > dev_dbg(bus->dev, "received error interrupt: 0x%08x\n", > irq_status); > bus->cmd_err = ret; > bus->master_state = ASPEED_I2C_MASTER_INACTIVE; > + status_ack |= (irq_status & ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_MASTER_ERRORS); > goto out_complete; > } > > /* We are in an invalid state; reset bus to a known state. */ > if (!bus->msgs) { > - dev_err(bus->dev, "bus in unknown state\n"); > + dev_err(bus->dev, "bus in unknown state irq_status: 0x%x\n", > + irq_status); > bus->cmd_err = -EIO; > - if (bus->master_state != ASPEED_I2C_MASTER_STOP) > + if (bus->master_state != ASPEED_I2C_MASTER_STOP && > + bus->master_state != ASPEED_I2C_MASTER_INACTIVE) > aspeed_i2c_do_stop(bus); > goto out_no_complete; > } > @@ -428,6 +423,11 @@ static bool aspeed_i2c_master_irq(struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus) > */ > if (bus->master_state == ASPEED_I2C_MASTER_START) { > if (unlikely(!(irq_status & ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_TX_ACK))) { > + if (unlikely(!(irq_status & ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_TX_NAK))) { > + bus->cmd_err = -ENXIO; > + bus->master_state = ASPEED_I2C_MASTER_INACTIVE; > + goto out_complete; > + } > pr_devel("no slave present at %02x\n", msg->addr); > status_ack |= ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_TX_NAK; > bus->cmd_err = -ENXIO; > @@ -506,7 +506,9 @@ static bool aspeed_i2c_master_irq(struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus) > goto out_no_complete; > case ASPEED_I2C_MASTER_STOP: > if (unlikely(!(irq_status & ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_NORMAL_STOP))) { > - dev_err(bus->dev, "master failed to STOP\n"); > + dev_err(bus->dev, > + "master failed to STOP irq_status:0x%x\n", > + irq_status); > bus->cmd_err = -EIO; > /* Do not STOP as we have already tried. */ > } else { > @@ -540,33 +542,51 @@ static bool aspeed_i2c_master_irq(struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus) > bus->master_xfer_result = bus->msgs_index + 1; > complete(&bus->cmd_complete); > out_no_complete: > - if (irq_status != status_ack) > - dev_err(bus->dev, > - "irq handled != irq. expected 0x%08x, but was 0x%08x\n", > - irq_status, status_ack); > - return !!irq_status; > + return status_ack; > } > > static irqreturn_t aspeed_i2c_bus_irq(int irq, void *dev_id) > { > struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus = dev_id; > - bool ret; > + u32 irq_received, irq_status, irq_acked; > > spin_lock(&bus->lock); > + irq_received = readl(bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_INTR_STS_REG); > + irq_status = irq_received; > > #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I2C_SLAVE) > - if (aspeed_i2c_slave_irq(bus)) { > - dev_dbg(bus->dev, "irq handled by slave.\n"); > - ret = true; > - goto out; > + /* > + * In most cases, interrupt bits will be set one by one, although > + * multiple interrupt bits could be set at the same time. It's also > + * possible that master interrupt bits could be set along with slave > + * interrupt bits. Each case needs to be handled using corresponding > + * handlers depending on the current state. > + */ > + if (bus->master_state != ASPEED_I2C_MASTER_INACTIVE) { > + irq_acked = aspeed_i2c_master_irq(bus, irq_status); > + irq_status &= ~irq_acked; > + if (irq_status) > + irq_acked = aspeed_i2c_slave_irq(bus, irq_status); > + } else { > + irq_acked = aspeed_i2c_slave_irq(bus, irq_status); > + irq_status &= ~irq_acked; > + if (irq_status) > + irq_acked = aspeed_i2c_master_irq(bus, irq_status); > } > +#else > + irq_acked = aspeed_i2c_master_irq(bus, irq_status); > #endif /* CONFIG_I2C_SLAVE */ > > - ret = aspeed_i2c_master_irq(bus); > + irq_status &= ~irq_acked; > + if (irq_status) > + dev_err(bus->dev, > + "irq handled != irq. expected 0x%08x, but was 0x%08x\n", > + irq_received, irq_received ^ irq_status); I think you want to use `irq_acked` here. > > -out: > + /* Ack all interrupt bits. */ > + writel(irq_received, bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_INTR_STS_REG); > spin_unlock(&bus->lock); > - return ret ? IRQ_HANDLED : IRQ_NONE; > + return irq_status ? IRQ_NONE : IRQ_HANDLED; > } > > static int aspeed_i2c_master_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, > -- > 2.18.0 > One minor issue and then I think we are good to go! Also, sorry about not reviewing your last patch. I missed it apparently. Feel free to mark the next patch "Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins " Cheers